On 09/17/2013 05:37 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 2.7, >>> license() return a text that includes a complete list of
> releases from 1.6 to 2.7 and stops there
> � � �Release � � � � Derived � � Year � � � �Owner � � � GPL-
> � � � � � � � � � � �from � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �compatible? (1)
>
> � � �0.9.0 thru 1.2 � � � � � � �1991-1995 � CWI � � � � yes
> � � �1.3 thru 1.5.2 �1.2 � � � � 1995-1999 � CNRI � � � �yes
> � � �1.6 � � � � � � 1.5.2 � � � 2000 � � � �CNRI � � � �no
> � � �2.0 � � � � � � 1.6 � � � � 2000 � � � �BeOpen.com �no
> ...
> � � �2.6.5 � � � � � 2.6.4 � � � 2010 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
> � � �2.7 � � � � � � 2.6 � � � � 2010 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
>
> Was it intentional to stop with 2.7 and not continue with 2.7.1, etc?
>
> On 3.3.2, the 2.x list ends with 2.6.5 and never mentions 2.7. Intentional?
> It then jumps back to 3.0 and ends with the 'previous' release, 3.3.1.
> Should 3.3.2 be included in the 3.3.2 list?
>
> ...
> � � �2.6.4 � � � � � 2.6.3 � � � 2009 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
> � � �2.6.5 � � � � � 2.6.4 � � � 2010 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
> � � �3.0 � � � � � � 2.6 � � � � 2008 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
> � � �3.0.1 � � � � � 3.0 � � � � 2009 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
> ...
> � � �3.2.4 � � � � � 3.2.3 � � � 2013 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
> � � �3.3.0 � � � � � 3.2 � � � � 2012 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
> � � �3.3.1 � � � � � 3.3.0 � � � 2013 � � � �PSF � � � � yes

Since there are 3 versions of this table, it's unavoidable that one of them
gets out of sync :)

* LICENSE
* Doc/license.rst
* the versions for each release on the website

So I wholeheartedly support truncating before 2.2 (which is the first
release where all micro versions are PSF owned and GPL compatible) and
just saying "2.2 onwards" (or whatever is the best way to say it).

cheers,
Georg

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org


-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) ">

(original) (raw)

OK. Let's do it.


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl@gmx.net> wrote:
On 09/17/2013 05:37 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
\> On 2.7, >>> license() return a text that includes a complete list of
\> releases from 1.6 to 2.7 and stops there
\> � � �Release � � � � Derived � � Year � � � �Owner � � � GPL-
\> � � � � � � � � � � �from � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �compatible? (1)
\>
\> � � �0.9.0 thru 1.2 � � � � � � �1991-1995 � CWI � � � � yes
\> � � �1.3 thru 1.5.2 �1.2 � � � � 1995-1999 � CNRI � � � �yes
\> � � �1.6 � � � � � � 1.5.2 � � � 2000 � � � �CNRI � � � �no
\> � � �2.0 � � � � � � 1.6 � � � � 2000 � � � �BeOpen.com �no
\> ...
\> � � �2.6.5 � � � � � 2.6.4 � � � 2010 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
\> � � �2.7 � � � � � � 2.6 � � � � 2010 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
\>
\> Was it intentional to stop with 2.7 and not continue with 2.7.1, etc?
\>
\> On 3.3.2, the 2.x list ends with 2.6.5 and never mentions 2.7\. Intentional?
\> It then jumps back to 3.0 and ends with the 'previous' release, 3.3.1.
\> Should 3.3.2 be included in the 3.3.2 list?
\>
\> ...
\> � � �2.6.4 � � � � � 2.6.3 � � � 2009 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
\> � � �2.6.5 � � � � � 2.6.4 � � � 2010 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
\> � � �3.0 � � � � � � 2.6 � � � � 2008 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
\> � � �3.0.1 � � � � � 3.0 � � � � 2009 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
\> ...
\> � � �3.2.4 � � � � � 3.2.3 � � � 2013 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
\> � � �3.3.0 � � � � � 3.2 � � � � 2012 � � � �PSF � � � � yes
\> � � �3.3.1 � � � � � 3.3.0 � � � 2013 � � � �PSF � � � � yes

Since there are 3 versions of this table, it's unavoidable that one of them
gets out of sync :)

\* LICENSE
\* Doc/license.rst
\* the versions for each release on the website

So I wholeheartedly support truncating before 2.2 (which is the first
release where all micro versions are PSF owned and GPL compatible) and
just saying "2.2 onwards" (or whatever is the best way to say it).

cheers,
Georg

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org



--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/\~guido)