(original) (raw)



On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:

It sounds like a reasonable approach to me.

In terms of naming, would you consider "concurrent.asyncio"? When we created that parent namespace for futures, one of the other suggested submodules discussed was the standard event loop API.

+1 but up to guido

Cheers,
Nick.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jnoller%40gmail.com