(original) (raw)

On 10/15/2013 9:28 AM, PJ Eby wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:52 AM, R. David Murray  wrote:  
> I think 'trap' would be much clearer.  
+1\. Short and sweet, and just ambiguous enough that you don't leap to  
the conclusion that the error is ignored. I agree that "suppress" is  
basically a synonym for "ignore"; trap at least \*implies\* some kind of  
control flow change, which is what's needed to prevent misconceptions.

Yes, trap or catch imply a control flow change, ignore and suppress do not.