Hello,

Guido has told me that he was ready to approve PEP 428 (pathlib) in its
latest amended form.  Here is the last call for any comments or
arguments against approval, before Guido marks the PEP accepted (or
changes his mind :-)).

Is 'ext' going to exist with 'suffix'? Seems redundant (I'm guessing the example is out-of-date and 'ext' was changed to suffix).
">

(original) (raw)




On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:

Hello,

Guido has told me that he was ready to approve PEP 428 (pathlib) in its
latest amended form. Here is the last call for any comments or
arguments against approval, before Guido marks the PEP accepted (or
changes his mind :-)).

Is 'ext' going to exist with 'suffix'? Seems redundant (I'm guessing the example is out-of-date and 'ext' was changed to suffix).

And a very minor grammatical thing: "you have to lookup a dedicate attribute" -> "dedicated"