Hello,

argparse does prefix matching as long as there are no conflicts. For example:
">

(original) (raw)




On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

argparse does prefix matching as long as there are no conflicts. For example:


argparser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
argparser.add_argument('--sync-foo', action='store_true')

args = argparser.parse_args()

If I pass "--sync" to this script, it recognizes it as "--sync-foo". This behavior is quite surprising although I can see the motivation for it. At the very least it should be much more explicitly documented (AFAICS it's barely mentioned in the docs).


If there's another argument registered, say "--sync-bar" the above will fail due to a conflict.

Now comes the nasty part. When using "parse_known_args" instead of "parse_args", the above happens too - --sync is recognized for --sync-foo and captured by the parser. But this is wrong! The whole idea of parse_known_args is to parse the known args, leaving unknowns alone. This prefix matching harms more than it helps here because maybe the program we're actually acting as a front-end for (and hence using parse_known_args) knows about --sync and wants to get it.


Unless I'm missing something, this is a bug. But I'm also not sure whether we can do anything about it at this point, as existing code *may* be relying on it. The right thing to do would be to disable this prefix matching when parse_known_args is called.


Again, at the very least this should be documented (for parse_known_args not less than a warning box, IMHO).

I created http://bugs.python.org/issue19814 for the documentation patch.


http://bugs.python.org/issue14910 deals with making prefix matching optional, but that will have to be deferred to 3.5

Eli