This PEP goes a but further than PEP 460 does, and hopefully spells things out in enough detail so there is no confusion as to what is meant.
">

(original) (raw)




On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
This PEP goes a but further than PEP 460 does, and hopefully spells things out in enough detail so there is no confusion as to what is meant.

Are we going down the PEP route with the various ideas? Guido, do you want one from me as well or should I not bother?