Contestant 1: "Add .clinic.h"
    
foo.c -> foo.c.clinic.h
      foo.h -> foo.h.clinic.h
-0�
    
    Contestant 2: "Add .ac.h"
    
foo.c -> foo.c.ac.h
      foo.h -> foo.h.ac.h
-1�
">

(original) (raw)

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Larry Hastings <larry@hastings.org> wrote:

Contestant 1: "Add .clinic.h"
foo.c -> foo.c.clinic.h
foo.h -> foo.h.clinic.h
-0�
Contestant 2: "Add .ac.h"
foo.c -> foo.c.ac.h
foo.h -> foo.h.ac.h
-1�
Contestant 3: "Add .clinic"
foo.c -> foo.c.clinic
foo.h -> foo.h.clinic
-1 (This will break too many tools in the C/C++ tools ecosystem and I am not convinced by any of the arguments given those far.)�
Contestant 4: "Put in clinic directory, add .h"
foo.c -> clinic/foo.c.h
foo.h -> clinic/foo.h.h
+1�
Contestant 5: "Put in \_\_clinic\_\_ directory, add .h"
foo.c -> \_\_clinic\_\_/foo.c.h
foo.h -> \_\_clinic\_\_/foo.h.h
-1 ("clinic" without the dunders more clear for a directory name.)�

-- Meador