(original) (raw)
You forgot 3., and 3.$.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:Terrible idea. Would wreak havoc with comparisons. No. Python 3 is all
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:04:08 +0100
> "Stefan Richthofer" <Stefan.Richthofer@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> > Guido famously hates two digit minor version numbers. :)
>>
>> This is no problem either. Simply switch to hexadecimal numbering ;)
>
> Or wrap around to negative numbers (a minus sign isn't technically a
> digit, is it?).
about Unicode, so the right way to proceed is 3.8, 3.9, 3.:, 3.;, 3.<,
3.=, 3.>, 3.?, 3.@, 3.A.
ChrisA
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/rymg19%40gmail.com
Ryan
If anybody ever asks me why I prefer C++ to C, my answer will be simple: "It's becauseslejfp23(@#Q\*(E\*EIdc-SEGFAULT. Wait, I don't think that was nul-terminated."