On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben@gmail.com> wrote:
">

(original) (raw)

I don't think so. asyncio depends on selectors but not vice versa. The selectors module was not part of PEP 3156\. It is solid and I don't see any reason why it should get a reprieve from the usual strict backwards compatibility standards.


--Guido


On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben@gmail.com> wrote:




On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' <g.rodola@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:25 PM, R. David Murray <rdmurray@bitdance.com> wrote:
Not Provisional:

selectors

Wouldn't it be wiser to consider this one provisional as well?

+1 because of the intimate ties to asyncio

Eli

�

�

--

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/eliben%40gmail.com



\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org




--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/\~guido)