(original) (raw)

"python" should always be the same as "python2".

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:41:58AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
\> On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
\>
\> >My biggest problem with \`\`python3\`\`, is what happens after 3.9.
\>
\> FWIW, 3.9 by my rough calculation is 7 years away.

That makes it 2021, one year after Python 2.7 free support ends, but two
years before Red Hat commercial support for it ends.

\> I seem to recall Guido saying that \*if\* there's a 4.0, it won't be a major
\> break like Python 3, whatever that says about the numbering scheme after 3.9.
\>
\> Is 7 years enough to eradicate Python 2 the way we did for Python 1? Then
\> maybe Python 4 can reclaim /usr/bin/python.

I expect not quite. Perhaps 10 years though.



\--
Steven
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org



--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/\~guido)