(original) (raw)
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 at 10:41 Herbert Kruitbosch <python-dev@herbertkruitbosch.com> wrote:data\_sorted = sort(data, key = #1\[0\])That syntax won't work because \`#\` is used to start a comment and there is no way to disambiguate that in the grammar.
Obviously :) The #-syntax is used by Mathematica, which is why I used it here. As you stated, it is not adequate for python3\. You could imagine a $n or \*\*\*n syntax. I'm not in any way well informed on the python3 syntax, nor what would be aesthetically appealing and readable.
where the #1 is similar to the one used in Mathematica for the same purpose. That is, an expression with #1 becomes an anonymous function which takes one argument, and, obviously, if a #n is included, the anonymous function takes n arguments.Notice that #1\[0\] does not seem like partial function application, however it is if you (C++'isly) assume that the deference operation \[\] is a function dereference(subscriptable, subscript).Obviously, I am only expecting that you get these type of suggestions all the time and that there is a good change you do not find it adequate for many reasons, for example keeping the language compact. I this case, I would also like to hear so.In my code the few times I want partial function applications I have found the functions in the operator module meet that need, else functools.partial or a quickly written closure do the trick. I don't think dedicated syntax is warranted when those other options already exist to meet the same need.
I would guess it depends on personal preference. And like you stated, there are many clear and intuitive workarounds. I never got to the point where functools.partial and operator.\* became part of my coding equipment, and I would adore this feature. I'm very curious if there are more people on my team, but am also interested to hear about opinions against such a feature.
Thanks for the suggestion!
No problem, and thank you for reading it :)
Herbert