(original) (raw)
I don't follow.� Because you're an advocate of Python switching to git and GitHub, we should have a git tutorial committed as a Python Enhancement Proposal?
I'm not attempting to stir up a conversation about git vs hg.� I only question the idea that a git tutorial should be a PEP, when it has literally nothing to do with enhancing Python.� There are countless other venues through which Oleg could publish this information--a blog, a wiki, or even a series of postings to this newsgroup. I would encourage him to withdraw the PEP and publish through one of those.
/arry
On 09/15/2015 07:22 PM, Guido van
Rossum wrote:
For one, because \*I\* have been a (moderate) advocate for switching to git and GitHub.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl@gmx.net> wrote:
On 09/15/2015 08:02 PM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
\> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:46:55AM -0700, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org> wrote:
\>> This looks like good information, but why is it a PEP? If anything, the
\>> devguide was probably be more appropriate. But even that's strange
\>> considering we don't use git at the moment.
\>
\>� � Exactly because the core team doesn't use git the information doesn't
\> belong to the current revision of Developer's Guide.
And if it doesn't propose to make the core team use git, why is it a PEP?
Georg
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
\--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/\~guido)
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/larry%40hastings.org