(original) (raw)

I'm very interested in it.

Ruby 2.2 and PHP 7 are faster than Python 2.
Python 3 is slower than Python 2.
Performance is a attractive feature. Python 3 lacks it.

How can I help your work?

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner@gmail.com> wrote:
2016-01-25 22:51 GMT+01:00 Sven R. Kunze <srkunze@mail.de>:
\> - they provide a great infrastructure for optimizing CPython AND
\> extending/experimenting Python as an ecosystem

I hope that these API will create more optimizer projects than just
fatoptimizer.

For example, I expect more specialized optimizers like numba or
pythran which are very efficient but more specific (ex: numeric
computations) than fatoptimizer. Maybe not new optimizers, but just
glue to existing static compilers (numba, pythran, cython, etc.).


\> If there's anything I can do, let me know. :)

Oh, they are a lot of things to do! My patches for PEP 509, 510 and
511 still need some love (reviews):

http://bugs.python.org/issue26058
http://bugs.python.org/issue26098
http://bugs.python.org/issue26145

I'm finishing my patch adding ast.Constant. This one is less
controversal, it has no impact on performance nor the Python
semantics:

http://bugs.python.org/issue26146


But these patches are boring C code. You may prefer to work on the
funny fatoptimizer project which is written in pure Python:

https://fatoptimizer.readthedocs.org/en/latest/

Victor
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/songofacandy%40gmail.com



--
INADA Naoki <songofacandy@gmail.com>