(original) (raw)



On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 at 16:25 Nathaniel Smith <njs@pobox.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> wrote:
\>
\>
\> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 at 15:22 Paul Moore <p.f.moore@gmail.com> wrote:
\>>
\>> So I think we need a builtin.
\>
\>
\> Well, the ugliness shouldn't survive forever if the community shifts over to
\> using pathlib while the built-in will. We also don't have a built-in for
\> \_\_index\_\_() so it depends on whether we expect this sort of thing to be the
\> purview of library authors or if normal people will be interacting with it
\> (it's probably both during the transition, but I don't know afterwards).

For \_\_index\_\_ the "built-in" is:

from operator import index

Which suggests perhaps we should have pathlib.fspath() instead of a built-in.