(original) (raw)
On 06.04.2016 22:55, Brett Cannon wrote:On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 at 13:54 Sven R. Kunze <srkunze@mail.de> wrote:
Furthermore, we MIGHT later want some URI support, so I don't know off the top of my head if there's a difference between \_\_fspath\_\_ and \_\_urlpath\_\_ but better separate it now. Later we can re-merge then if necessary.
There's a difference as a URL represents something different than a file system path (URI doesn't necessarily). Plus the serialized format would be different, etc.
Sure. URLs and URIs are more than just paths. I would expect \_\_urlpath\_\_ to be different than \_\_url\_\_ itself but if that's is a different discussion.
So, \_\_fspath\_\_ for me. :)
Best,
Sven