(original) (raw)

On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 13:40 Sven R. Kunze <srkunze@mail.de> wrote:

On 10.04.2016 16:51, Paul Moore wrote:
\> On 10 April 2016 at 15:07, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze@mail.de> wrote:
\>> If there's some agreement to change things with respect to those 5 points, I
\>> am willing to put some time into it.
\> In broad terms I agree with these points. Thanks for doing the
\> research. It would certainly be good to try to improve pathlib based
\> on this sort of feedback while it is still provisional.

I'd appreciate some guidance on this. Just let me know what I can do
since I don't know the processes of hacking CPython.

https://docs.python.org/devguide/ and https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-mentorship are your friends. :)

For new features of a module you can discuss it on python-ideas first before proposing a patch if you're worried a patch implementing the feature might get rejected and you don't want to risk wasting your time.

-Brett