(original) (raw)

So code that depends on iterating through bytecode via HAS\_ARG is going to break...

Darn it. :/

--
Ryan
\[ERROR\]: Your autotools build scripts are 200 lines longer than your program. Something’s wrong.
http://kirbyfan64.github.io/

On Apr 13, 2016 4:44 PM, "Victor Stinner" <victor.stinner@gmail.com> wrote:

Le mercredi 13 avril 2016, Ryan Gonzalez <rymg19@gmail.com> a écrit :
What is the value of HAS\_ARG going to be now?

I asked Demur to keep HAS\_ARG(). Not really for backward compatibility, but for the dis module: to keep a nice assembler. There are also debug traces in ceval.c which use it.

For ceval.c, we might use HAS\_ARG() to micro-optimize oparg=0 (hardcode 0 rather than reading the bytecode) for operators with no argument. Or maybe it's completly useless :-)

Victor