(original) (raw)
A better place for this question would be the tulip Google group:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/python-tulip
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/python-tulip
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:05 AM, cr0hn <cr0hn@cr0hn.com> wrote:
Hi all,It's the first time I write in this list. Sorry if it's not the best place for this question.After I read the Asyncio's documentation, PEPs, Guido/Jesse/David Beazley articles/talks, etc, I developed a PoC library that mixes: Process + Threads + Asyncio Tasks, doing an scheme like this diagram:main -> Process 1 -> Thread 1.1 -> Task 1.1.1-> Task 1.1.2-> Task 1.1.3-> Thread 1.2-> Task 1.2.1-> Task 1.2.2-> Task 1.2.3Process 2 -> Thread 2.1 -> Task 2.1.1-> Task 2.1.2-> Task 2.1.3-> Thread 2.2-> Task 2.2.1-> Task 2.2.2-> Task 2.2.3In my local tests, this approach appear to improve (and simplify) the concurrency/parallelism for some tasks but, before release the library at github, I don't know if my aproach is wrong and I would appreciate your opinion.Thank you very much for your time.Regards!--
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/\~guido)