(original) (raw)

At the dev sprint today, we discussed PEP 515; several people are keen to see it get into 3.6\. If someone doesn't get to it before tomorrow, one of the sprinters will try to do a final review and get it pushed.

--
Ned Deily
nad@python.org -- \[\]


On Sep 6, 2016, at 21:21, Eric V. Smith <eric@trueblade.com> wrote:

The implementation of '\_' in numeric literals is here:
http://bugs.python.org/issue26331

And to add '\_' in int.\_\_format\_\_ is here:
http://bugs.python.org/issue27080

But I don't want to add support in int.\_\_format\_\_ unless numeric literal support is added.

So, Georg and Serhiy: is issue 26331 going to get committed? If so, I'll commit 27080 (or you can). I just don't want the second part of PEP 515 to not make the deadline if the first part makes it in at the last minute.

Thanks!
Eric.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/nad%40python.org