(original) (raw)

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:

P.S. Although in this case, it may have just been a direct link to the
3.2 version of the 3.2 What's New - there isn't a lot we can do about
that, as when a branch goes unsupported, we usually stop updating the
docs as well (even when external links break)

Thanks for the note, Nick. I assumed that it would be something like that. I know the devs go to great lengths to keep the documentation accurate, but I personally would rather see efforts put towards current versions.

regards

Steve