(original) (raw)
On Jul 27, 2017 02:38, "MRAB" <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
On 2017-07-26 23:55, Koos Zevenhoven wrote:
IMO,
for item in sequence:
\# block
nobreak: # or perhaps \`if not break:\`
\# block
would be clearer (if the syntax is necessary at all).
You couldn't have "if not break:" because that would look like the start of an 'if' statement.
Do you mean as an implementation issue or for human readability?
"nobreak" would introduce a new keyword, but "not break" wouldn't.
Sure :)
-- Koos (mobile)