(original) (raw)

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
On 11/10/2017 07:48 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:

I don't mind the long name. Of all the options so far I really only like 'string\_annotations' so let's go with that.

As someone else mentioned, we have function annotations and variable annotations already, which makes string\_annotations sound like it's annotations for strings.


Contriwise, "annotation\_strings" sounds like a different type of annotation -- they are now being stored as strings, instead of something else.


​Or a step further (longer), with annotations\_as\_strings.

––Koos​


--
+ Koos Zevenhoven + http://twitter.com/k7hoven +