(original) (raw)

On 10 November 2017 at 19:17, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:

Ethan Furman wrote:

Contriwise, "annotation\_strings" sounds like a different type of annotation -- they are now being stored as strings, instead of something else.

How about "annotations\_as\_strings"?

That feels unambiguous. "annotations\_to\_str" is shorter, given that "str" is a type in Python, and "to" says that it's converting \*to\* string (it's given \*as\* an expression).

\--
Greg

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/pludemann%40google.com