(original) (raw)

On 22 November 2017 at 17:43, Paul Moore <p.f.moore@gmail.com> wrote:

On 22 November 2017 at 16:30, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi@gmail.com> wrote:
\> On 22 November 2017 at 17:24, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:
>> Given a comprehension (e.g. list comprehension) is expected to work
\>> nominally as \`constructor(generator expression)\`
\>
\> As Yury just explained, these two are not equivalent if there is an \`await\`
\> in the comprehension/generator expression.

As Antoine said, people \*expect\* them to work the same.

The difference is that a generator expression can be used independently, one can assign it to a variable etc. not necessary to wrap it into a list()

Anyway, can you propose an equivalent "defining" code for both? Otherwise it is not clear what you are defending.

Ivan