(original) (raw)

Just as I feared. While currently fixing this is just fixing a bug (nobody's code is going to break except perhaps some tests), with PEP 572 fixing this would be mandatory.

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 25 April 2018 at 18:23, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
\>>>> x={print(2): print(1) for \_ in \[1\]}
\> 1
\> 2
\>
\> Hmmmmmmmmm. One of these is not like the others...

Huh, it looks like we missed checking dict comprehensions when we
fixed dict displays to evaluate keys before the corresponding values.
That would qualify as a reasonable request for improvement in Python
3.8 :)

Cheers,
Nick.

\--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org



--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/\~guido)