(original) (raw)
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 at 08:52 Chris Barker - NOAA Federal via Python-Dev <python-dev@python.org> wrote:
Are we just having fun here?
Or might we actually start using a new naming convention for
the-syntax-formerly-known-as-generator-expressions?
If you can create a groundswell of support then maybe.
-Brett
\-CHB
Sent from my iPhone
\> On Jul 3, 2018, at 11:54 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
\>
\> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
\>> - list builder syntax is syntax which returns a list;
\>> - dict builder syntax is syntax which returns a dict;
\>> - set builder syntax is syntax which returns a set;
\>> - generator builder syntax is syntax which returns a generator.
\>
\> You only get a list/dict/set from the first three after
\> you've run the iterators within it, but with a generator
\> expression, you already have a generator before you've
\> run it. That makes it feel different to me.
\>
\> --
\> Greg
\> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\> Python-Dev mailing list
\> Python-Dev@python.org
\> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
\> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/chris.barker%40noaa.gov
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org