(original) (raw)
Given the cost of a mistake here I recommend a higher standard. But in the end it’s no longer my decision.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 11:18 AM Jeroen Demeyer <J.Demeyer@ugent.be> wrote:
On 2018-07-21 19:55, Guido van Rossum wrote:
\> I don’t think we can safely assume Python 3.7 has the same performance,
\> actually. A lot has changed.
I'm not denying that some things have changed. Rather, I claim that
those changes wouldn't invalidate the benchmarks.
I am comparing calls through tp\_call (A) versus optimized call paths
(B). I only need to assume that the speed improvements to (A) between
2.7 and 3.7 are not bigger than the speed improvements to (B).
Most optimizations which have been done in Python 3.x target (B). In
fact, I'm not aware of any optimization to (A) apart from maybe some
minor code improvements. So I think it's a relatively safe assumption
that the speed difference between (A) and (B) did not decrease from 2.7
to 3.7.
Jeroen.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
--Guido (mobile)