(original) (raw)
I wanted to send an update.
At the NumFocus Summit, I found out about...
This: https://www.force11.org/group/software-citation-working-group
& this: https://github.com/adrn/CitationPEP
I am going to work on a citation approach based off of those two sources and come back with a more developed proposal.
This: https://www.force11.org/group/software-citation-working-group
& this: https://github.com/adrn/CitationPEP
I am going to work on a citation approach based off of those two sources and come back with a more developed proposal.
-Jackie
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 1:12 PM MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
On 2018-09-17 05:05, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
\>
\> I wanted to start with an easy answer that is surely unsatisfying:
\> http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2015/01/how-to-cite-software-in-apa-style.html
\>
\> APA style is pretty popular, and it says that standard software doesn't
\> need to be specified. Standard software includes "Microsoft Word, Java,
\> and Adobe Photoshop." So I'd say Python fits well in that category, and
\> doesn't need to be cited.
\>
\> I said you wouldn't be satisfied...
\>
It goes on to say """Note: We don’t keep a comprehensive list of what
programs are “standard.” You make the call.""".
\[snip\]
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jackiekazil%40gmail.com
Jacqueline Kazil | @jackiekazil