Mail Thread Index (original) (raw)
- [no subject],Kent M. Pitman
- Re: #/char,Jon L White
- Re: character objects & randomness,Alan Bawden
- Re: character objects & randomness,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: character objects & randomness,Jonathan A . Rees
- Re: character objects & randomness,Jonathan A . Rees
- Re: character objects & randomness,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: eval-when,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: eval-when,Alan Bawden
- Re: eval-when,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: eval-when,Bernard S . Greenberg
- Re: eval-when,David A . Moon
- Re: eval-when,Greenberg . Multics at MIT-Multics
- Re: eval-when,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: #/ returning a "character object",David A. Moon
- Re: #/ returning a "character object",Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Confusion over character objects,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: Character objects,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: character objects,David A . Moon
- Re: character objects,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: character objects & representation issues,Alan Bawden
- Re: character objects & representation issues,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: character objects & representation issues,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: character objects & representation issues,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Bawden's remarks on characters,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Bawden's remarks on characters,Mike McMahon
- Re: Bawden's remarks on characters,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: generic types vs. specific types,Richard M. Stallman
- Re: generic types vs. specific types,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: CHPROP problems,RMS at MIT-AI
- Re: CHPROP problems,DLW at MIT-AI
- Re: CHPROP problems,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: CHPROP problems,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Proposal #3 for MacLISP characters...,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: characters,Richard J . Fateman
- Re: characters,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: "completely wrong",Robert W . Kerns
- Re: "And even if you don't like your code to be readable (sorry)",Richard M. Stallman
- Re: "And even if you don't like your code to be readable (sorry)",Robert W . Kerns
- [no subject],Carl W . Hoffman
- Re: Character Objects (what else!),TK at MIT-AI
- Re: Character Objects (what else!),Robert W . Kerns
- Re: unwinding-scope,MOON5 at MIT-AI
- Re: UNWINDING-SCOPE,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: unwinding-scope,Edward Barton
- Re: In reply to TK: Character Objects (what else!),DLW at MIT-AI
- Re: Request for comments (not about characters and fixnums!),Edward Barton
- Re: In reply to EB: unwind-protect,Daniel L . Weinreb
- [no subject],Robert W . Kerns
- [no subject],Carl W . Hoffman
- Re: UNWIND-PROTECT proposal (clarification),Edward Barton
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- [no subject],Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: amazing...,Chris Ryland
- Re: Red face,Robert W . Kerns
- [no subject],Robert W . Kerns
- [no subject],Robert W . Kerns
- Re: macro/expr property selection by funcall,Glenn S . Burke
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- Re: Generalized LET due to RMS,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: /* ... */,Alan Bawden
- Re: comment brackets,CSVAX . jkf at Berkeley
- Re: Suggestion for commenting brackets like /*...*/,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Multiple values,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: #\EOF,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: #\EOF (look before you leap),David A . Moon
- Re: eof,Richard M. Stallman
- Re: eof,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: #\EOF ... Yes, again.,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: #\EOF ... Yes, again.,CSVAX . jkf at Berkeley
- Re: #\EOF ... Yes, again.,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: #\EOF ... Yes, again.,Alan Bawden
- Re: #\EOF ... Yes, again.,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: #\EOF ... Yes, again.,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: #\EOF ... Yes, again.,David A . Moon
- Re: "What are you going to do about...",Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: destructuring and &mumbles,Alan Bawden
- Re: destructuring and &mumbles,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: destructuring and &mumbles,Alan Bawden
- Re: #| ... |#,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: #| ... |#,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: #| ... |#,Alan Bawden
- Re: #| ... |#,Alan Bawden
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- Re: #| One last comment on #| |#,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: #| One last comment on #| |#,Richard Mark Soley
- Re: #| One last comment on #| |#,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: #| One last comment on #| |#,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: #| One last comment on #| |#,Glenn S . Burke
- Re: Dave Touretzky's message on macros, destructuring, and functions,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Dave Touretzky's message on macros, destructuring, and functions,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: #|...|#,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Clearing up a fine point in your reply to Touretzky,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Nesting,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: #| ... |# = /* ... */,Dave Andre
- Re: Use of strings in PDP10 MACLISP,Jon L White
- Re: destructuring within "argument" positions,Jon L White
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- Re: DIGITP not yet resolved?,Jon L White
- Re: DIGITP not yet resolved?,Daniel L . Weinreb
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- Re: DIGITP,KMP at MIT-MC , JAR at MIT-MC
- Re: DIGITP,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: DIGITP,Howard I . Cannon
- Re: DIGITP,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: DIGITP,Carl W . Hoffman
- Re: DIGITP,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: DIGITP,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: MacLisp strings,Barry Margolin
- Re: KMP and JAR proposal for DIGITP,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Destructuring syntax,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Destructuring syntax,Jon L White
- Re: Destructuring syntax,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: DIGIT-WEIGHT,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: DIGITP's second arg, and error conditions,Jon L White
- Re: DIGITP and the hair in ROMAN,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: JONL's recenbt note on DIGITP,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Why DIGITP and DIGIT-WEIGHT?,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Why DIGITP and DIGIT-WEIGHT?,Glenn S . Burke
- Re: DIGITP and DIGIT-WEIGHT,George J . Carrette
- Re: DIGITP and DIGIT-WEIGHT,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: #|,Richard M. Stallman
- Re: Ooops, forgot to send this to LISP-FORUM,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Function invocation by key word,William A. Kornfeld
- Re: Function invocation by key word,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: DIGIT-WEIGHT/DIGITP and funny input bases,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: DIGIT-WEIGHT/DIGITP and funny input bases,George J . Carrette
- Re: DIGIT-WEIGHT/DIGITP and funny input bases,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: DIGIT-WEIGHT/DIGITP and funny input bases,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: DIGIT-WEIGHT/DIGITP and funny input bases,Glenn S . Burke
- Re: DIGIT-WEIGHT/DIGITP and funny input bases,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: DIGIT-WEIGHT/DIGITP and funny input bases,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: DIGIT-WEIGHT/DIGITP and funny input bases,Glenn S . Burke
- Re: DIGIT-WEIGHT/DIGITP and funny input bases,Barry Margolin
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- Re: DIGIT-WEIGHT etc.,Quux at CMU-10A
- Re: Destructuring, GLS's and RMS's suggestions, and &EVAL.,Jon L White
- Re: side effects and a complr bug.,George J . Carrette
- Re: DEFUN-KEYED.,George J . Carrette
- [no subject],Quux at CMU-10A
- Re: Thoughts on Completing Readers,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: A (possibly interesting) macro,William A. Kornfeld
- Re: A (possibly interesting) macro,George J . Carrette
- Re: SEQ,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Why not SUBST,Kent M . Pitman
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- Re: (setf (setq x (car y)) z),Alan Bawden
- [no subject],Thomas A . Boyle
- Re: from a Christian Science Monitor article on software,JoSH
- Re: from a Christian Science Monitor article on software,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: from a Christian Science Monitor article on software,JWALKER at BBNA
- Re: from a Christian Science Monitor article on software,George J . Carrette
- Re: Globe Article on Lisp,HGBaker . Symbolics at MIT-Multics
- [no subject],William A. Kornfeld
- Re: CSM article on software,Dave Andre
- Re: Unsolicited Plaudits,Jon L White
- Re: franz times,CSVAX . fateman at Berkeley
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- [no subject],Richard L . Bryan
- Re: LABELS, GOSUB (yech), etc.,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- [no subject],Daniel L . Weinreb
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- [no subject],Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: GOSUX,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: Time and time again,Scott J . Kramer
- Re: Response to Goto's lisp timings,Jon L White
- Re: DEFINEM,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: SKIPE and SKIPN,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: SKIPE and SKIPN,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: UUOLINKS and numbers...,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Format's C,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Format's C,Alan Bawden
- Re: JSA/SRA,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: Apple OWL Lisp timings,HGBaker . Symbolics at MIT-Multics
- Re: What it may mean.,Jon L White
- Re: SKIPE and SKIPN... and JSR,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: PROG tags,Daniel L . Weinreb
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- [no subject],Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: forcibly stuffing features into a form, ie, PROG ramming,JoSH
- Re: Line numbers,J . Noel Chiappa
- Re: Line numbers,George J . Carrette
- Re: Line numbers,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Line numbers and such,Daniel L . Weinreb
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- Re: Improving LISP "grossly",Barry Margolin
- Re: Improving LISP "grossly",George J . Carrette
- Re: ENOUGH!,Alan Bawden
- Re: Incompatibility,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Line numbers and finite-state machines in LISP,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Twenex CURSORPOS,Jon L White
- Re: SXHASH,Jon L White
- Re: SXHASH,George J . Carrette
- Re: SXHASH,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Poor ROTten SXHASH,Jon L White
- Re: Poor ROTten SXHASH,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Lispm SXHASH loses worse than you think.,William A. Kornfeld
- Re: *CATCH/*THROW -- CATCH/THROW,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Nutz!,Alan Bawden
- Re: MAKE-LIST,Jon L White
- Re: MAKE-LIST,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: MAKE-LIST,George J . Carrette
- Re: Compromise?,Jon L White
- Re: MAKE-LIST -- Compromise? Please, not that way ...,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: MAKE-LIST -- compromise or not?,Jon L White
- Re: What can LISPM community do about MAKE-LIST,jonl at MIT-MC , kmp at MIT-MC
- Re: What can LISPM community do about MAKE-LIST,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: MAKE-LIST kludge,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Using * in names,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: *****Idea!,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Improving the LISP working environment by taking a lesson from...,Deutsch at PARC-MAXC
- Re: Improving the LISP working environment by taking a lesson from...,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Improving the LISP working environment by taking a lesson from...,Richard M . Stallman
- Re: Improving the LISP working environment by taking a lesson from...,Jeffrey Shrager
- Re: Using macros in Mapping functions,Charles Rich
- Re: Using macros in Mapping functions,Earl A . Killian
- Re: Using macros in Mapping functions,David A . Moon
- Re: Using macros in Mapping functions,Charles Rich
- Re: Muddy diamonds,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Of diamonds and mud:,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Of diamonds and mud:,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Of diamonds and mud:,Jeffrey Shrager
- Re: lisp vs apl,JoSH
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- Re: APL and LISP,Alan Bawden
- Re: APL and LISP,Jeffrey Shrager
- Re: Applicable Macros?,Jon L White
- [no subject],Jon L White
- [no subject],MARC at MIT-XX
- [no subject],Deutsch at PARC-MAXC
- Re: Iteration Facilities,Jon L White
- Re: iteration facilities,Glenn S. Burke
- Re: Sifting thru the "good mud": LISP vs APL,Jon L White
- Re: Forgot to CC this,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- Re: Diamonds vs mud?,HGBaker . Symbolics at MIT-Multics
- Re: Diamonds vs Gold,HGBaker . Symbolics at MIT-Multics
- Re: Historical clarification on &PROTECT,Kent M . Pitman
- [no subject],Richard Mark Soley
- [no subject],Earl A . Killian
- Re: I suppose I have to put in my two cents about DEFSUBST,David A . Moon
- Re: I suppose I have to put in my two cents about DEFSUBST,Deutsch at PARC-MAXC
- Re: I suppose I have to put in my two cents about DEFSUBST,George J . Carrette
- Re: LISP vs. APL,Joel Moses
- Re: Snapped Elastic,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Snapped Elastic,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: DEFSUBST,Richard M. Stallman
- Re: DEFSUBST clarification,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: LOOP Macro a Winner,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: LOOP Macro a Winner,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: LOOP,Carl W . Hoffman
- Re: LOOP loses,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: (more) problems with (STATUS FEATURES),Kent M . Pitman
- Re: (more) problems with (STATUS FEATURES),CSVAX . jkf at Berkeley
- Re: (more) problems with (STATUS FEATURES),Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Moon's proposed incompatible change to PUTPROP,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: macro expansion,CSVAX . fateman at Berkeley
- Re: macro expansion,Alan Bawden
- Re: macro expansion,CSVAX . fateman at Berkeley
- Re: macro expansion,Alan Bawden
- Re: macro expansion,CSVAX . fateman at Berkeley
- Re: macro expansion,Alan Bawden
- Re: macro expansion,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Macros,Bernard S . Greenberg
- Re: Feature double creature,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: FEATURE-CASEQ and TARGET-FEATURES,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: DEFSTRUCT and reclaimable storage,William A. Kornfeld
- Re: DEFSTRUCT and reclaimable storage,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: DEFSTRUCT and reclaimable storage,Alan Bawden
- Re: DEFSTRUCT, reclaimable storage, and "resources",William A. Kornfeld
- Re: null LAMBDA bodies?,Jon L White
- Re: null LAMBDA bodies?,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: null LAMBDA bodies?,Richard L . Bryan
- Re: null LAMBDA bodies?,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: ((LAMBDA ())) => NIL ?,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Special names for Open-Coded Functions,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Open-coding, and proliferation of function names,Jon L White
- Re: Open-coding, and proliferation of function names,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Open-coding, and proliferation of function names,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Open-coding, and proliferation of function names,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Open-coding, and proliferation of function names,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: food for hack.,George J . Carrette
- Re: food for hack.,Richard Mark Soley
- Re: (progn 'compile ...),George J . Carrette
- Re: (progn 'compile ...),Earl A . Killian
- Re: (progn 'compile ...),Robert W . Kerns
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- Re: SUBST,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: PROGN 'COMPILE,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: PROGN 'COMPILE,George J . Carrette
- [no subject],Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: EQ(UAL) in SUBST,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: EQ(UAL) in SUBST,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: EQ(UAL) in SUBST,Daniel L . Weinreb
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- Re: Statistics on Macsyma use of SUBST,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: is it sensible to think of an extended address Lisp for the DEC-20?,HEDRICK at RUTGERS
- Re: is it sensible to think of an extended address Lisp for the DEC-20?,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: is it sensible to think of an extended address Lisp for the DEC-20?,Deutsch at PARC-MAXC
- Re: is it sensible to think of an extended address Lisp for the DEC-20?,Rindfleisch at SUMEX-AIM
- Re: is it sensible to think of an extended address Lisp for the DEC-20?,Chris Ryland
- Re: is it sensible to think of an extended address Lisp for the DEC-20?,Mark Crispin
- Re: a note on extended addressing lisp for 20's,JoSH
- Re: is it sensible to think of an extended address Lisp for the,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: EQP,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: EQP,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: EQP/EQL,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: EQL,Kent M . Pitman
- [no subject],Robert W . Kerns
- Re: More LOOP fan mail.,George J . Carrette
- Re: More LOOP fan mail.,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: More LOOP fan mail.,David Chapman
- Re: LOOP fan mail,Glenn S. Burke
- Re: more loop fan mail,George J . Carrette
- Re: more loop fan mail,Edward Barton
- Re: even more loop fan mail,Glenn S . Burke
- Re: LOOP usage, versus "best-optimizeable-codings",Jon L White
- Re: Point of incompatibility between MacLisp and Lispm lisp,William A. Kornfeld
- Re: generalization of PUSH,George J . Carrette
- Re: This really has very little to do with LOOP,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: extended addressing,HEDRICK at RUTGERS
- Re: extended addressing,Chris Ryland
- Re: extended addressing,HEDRICK at RUTGERS
- Re: extended addressing,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: Add me to mailing list,Martin.Griss
- Re: Is LEXPR-FUNCALL a pain?,George J . Carrette
- Re: Is LEXPR-FUNCALL a pain?,Mike McMahon
- Re: Is LEXPR-FUNCALL a pain?,George J . Carrette
- Re: Is LEXPR-FUNCALL a pain?,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Consistency: #\... and (FORMAT s "~:C" c),Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Once again a plea for slash,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Once again a plea for slash,Martin.Griss
- Re: Once again a plea for slash,John G . Aspinall
- Re: Once again a plea for slash,Deutsch at PARC-MAXC
- Re: Once again a plea for slash,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Once again a plea for slash,Howard I . Cannon
- Re: Once again a plea for slash,CSVAX . fateman at Berkeley
- Once again a plea for slash,Gerald Jay Sussman
- Re: Once again a plea for slash,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: COPY ?,Jon L White
- Re: COPY-TOP-LEVEL,Jon L White
- Re: COPY-TOP-LEVEL,Barry M . Trager
- Re: Misc,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: rationals as a Lisp data type,CSVAX . fateman at Berkeley
- Re: rationals as a Lisp data type,George J . Carrette
- Re: Slash: confusing the issue,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Slash: confusing the issue,Howard I . Cannon
- Re: Quotation concerning rational arithmetic,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Quotation concerning rational arithmetic,George J . Carrette
- Re: Quotation concerning rational arithmetic,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Forwarded message and reply,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Division in Smalltalk,Deutsch at PARC-MAXC
- Re: modular arith.,George J . Carrette
- Re: Desirable macro,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Desirable macro,Earl A . Killian
- Re: Desirable macro,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Desirable macro,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Desirable macro,Earl A . Killian
- Re: Canonicalization of predicate oredering in DEL, MEM, etc.,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Canonicalization of predicate oredering in DEL, MEM, etc.,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Canonicalization of predicate oredering in DEL, MEM, etc.,David A . Moon
- Re: Desirable (?) macro,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: default value for GET and friends,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- [no subject],Susan Lynn Thunder
- Re: Case study: Macro forms as operators in Maclisp,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Case study: Macro forms as operators in Maclisp,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: More on macros in Maclisp,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: even more on macros in maclisp,George J . Carrette
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- [no subject],RMS at MIT-MC
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- Re: Problem with ((FIRST) ...),Richard M. Stallman
- Re: Problem with ((FIRST) ...),Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Multiple use of symbols,Richard M. Stallman
- Re: lambda-macros,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: COPYTREE,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: COPYTREE,Daniel L. Weinreb
- Re: COPYTREE,Dave Andre
- Re: COPYTREE,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: COPYTREE,Carl W . Hoffman
- Re: COPYTREE,JONL at MIT-MC , RWK at MIT-MC
- Re: COPYTREE,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Proposed schedule for change from "/" to "\",Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Proposed schedule for change from "/" to "\",Gail Zacharias
- Re: Proposed schedule for change from "/" to "\",George J . Carrette
- Re: Proposed schedule for change from "/" to "\",Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Proposed schedule for change from "/" to "\",Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Proposed schedule for change from "/" to "\",George J . Carrette
- Re: \\\\,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: COPYALL, COPYLIST, et alia,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: COPYALL, COPYLIST, et alia,Dave Andre
- Re: COPYALL, COPYLIST, et alia,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: COPYALL, COPYLIST, et alia,Chris Ryland
- Re: COPYALL, COPYLIST, et alia,George J . Carrette
- Re: COPYALL, COPYLIST, et alia,David A . Moon
- Re: COPYALL, COPYLIST, et alia,George J . Carrette
- Re: COPYALL, COPYLIST, et alia,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: COPYALL, COPYLIST, et alia,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: COPYALL, COPYLIST, et alia,Allan C. Wechsler
- Re: COPYALL, COPYLIST, et alia,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: (COP pred form),Kent M . Pitman
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- [no subject],Dave Andre
- [no subject],Daniel L . Weinreb
- [no subject],Alan Bawden
- Re: / and \,Moon at MIT-AI
- Re: / and \,DLW at MIT-AI
- Re: / and \,Earl A . Killian
- Re: / and \,Earl A . Killian
- Re: / and \,Daniel L . Weinreb
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- Re: / to \,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: ``\\ (fixnum gcd) is useless and can simply be flushed'',William G . Dubuque
- [no subject],Richard C. Waters
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- Re: / => \,Alan Bawden
- Re: / => \,Henry Lieberman
- Re: FIXNUM-restricted versions of rational funs,Jon L White
- Re: \ and \\,Jon L White
- Re: Proposed change to TRACE,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\,David C . Plummer
- Re: /\ vote,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: /\ vote,William A. Kornfeld
- Re: /\,Earl A . Killian
- Re: /\ Mess.,Dave Andre
- Re: /\ Mess, upward compatibility,David A. Moon
- Re: /\ Mess, upward compatibility,George J . Carrette
- Re: /\ Mess, upward compatibility,Dave Andre
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- Re: George, take a walk until your hat floats.,Alan Bawden
- Re: George, take a walk until your hat floats.,George J . Carrette
- Re: George, take a float until your hat walks.,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: mode lines,George J . Carrette
- Re: mode lines,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: mode lines,Dave Andre
- Re: file mode lines,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: trace change,Richard C. Waters
- Re: Floating hats,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: ITS getting file properties,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: -*- line,Daniel L. Weinreb
- Re: Explanation about file property lists.,Daniel L. Weinreb
- Re: more on file prop lists,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Compatible? with whom?,Jon L White
- Re: Compatible? with whom?,George J . Carrette
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- Re: Source-to-source transformations,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: optimizers,Richard M. Stallman
- Re: optimizers,Glenn S . Burke
- Re: Optimizers,Dick Gabriel
- Re: optimizers,George J . Carrette
- Re: Optimizers,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: optimizers,Richard M. Stallman
- Re: optimizers,George J . Carrette
- Re: Optimizers,Daniel L. Weinreb
- Re: FILTERs: Source-to-source code transformers,Jon L White
- Re: Use of MULTIPLE-VALUE and VALUES,Jon L White
- Re: Use of MULTIPLE-VALUE and VALUES,Glenn S . Burke
- Re: Use of MULTIPLE-VALUE and VALUES,Glenn S . Burke
- Re: Use of MULTIPLE-VALUE and VALUES,George J . Carrette
- Re: COMPLR address space,Jon L White
- Re: Optimizers and macros,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Optimizers and macros,George J . Carrette
- Re: P.S., regarding optimizers,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Thoughts on GLS's (non)suggestion,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Thoughts on GLS's (non)suggestion,George J . Carrette
- Re: Flush Old I/O symbols in MacLISP?,Jon L White
- Re: Flush Old I/O symbols in MacLISP?,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: Flush Old I/O symbols in MacLISP?,James E . O'Dell
- Re: Compilation in Standard LISP,Martin.Griss
- Re: Compilation in Standard LISP,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Compilation in Standard LISP,Deutsch at PARC-MAXC
- Re: Snide remarks,Richard M . Stallman
- Re: "snide remarks"?,Jon L White
- Re: Filters,Richard M . Stallman
- Re: Idea: New way for optimizers to work,Richard M. Stallman
- Re: Syntax for optimizers in function definition,Richard M. Stallman
- Re: vote on destructuring,Henry Lieberman
- Re: Vote on destructuring,Henry Lieberman
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- Re: upper and lower case,CSVAX . jkf at Berkeley
- Re: upper and lower case,George J . Carrette
- Re: upper and lower case,Howard I . Cannon
- Re: upper and lower case,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: upper and lower case,CSVAX . jkf at Berkeley
- Re: upper and lower case,George J . Carrette
- Re: upper and lower case,Bruce E . Edwards
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Problem with LETF,Richard M. Stallman
- Re: Case,Richard M. Stallman
- Re: More case,Richard M. Stallman
- Re: More case,Earl A . Killian
- Re: More case,George J . Carrette
- Re: More case,Earl A . Killian
- Re: DEFMACRO incompatible,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: DEFMACRO incompatible,David A. Moon
- Re: DEFMACRO incompatible,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: Casifying at output time wins for what I want it to do.,RMS at MIT-AI
- Re: more on mixed case,CSVAX . jkf at Berkeley
- Re: more on mixed case,George J . Carrette
- Re: a quick question about cases,CSVAX . jkf at Berkeley
- Re: a quick question about cases,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Question about case,Bruce E. Edwards
- Re: Casifying at output time doesn't win...,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: LET, LETF, etc. What do others think?,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: destructuring,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: destructuring,George J . Carrette
- Re: destructuring,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: destructuring,George J . Carrette
- Re: Array modification feature,David L. Andre
- Re: Array modification feature,John G . Aspinall
- Re: Array modification feature,Dave Andre
- Re: [Re: Destructuring syntax],P. David Lebling
- Re: but you're losing flexibility...,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Old IO symbols in MACSYMA,Jeffrey P . Golden
- Re: Destructuring LET,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Disappointment,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: &keywords,Richard M. Stallman
- Re: &keywords,George J . Carrette
- Re: &keywords,Edward Barton
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- Re: guess what.,George J . Carrette
- Re: guess what.,Barry Margolin
- Re: & as reader syntax,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: Your mail of 3 February 1981 18:37-EST,Barry Margolin
- Re: Oh God! Still More Case!,Robert W . Kerns
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- Re: In search of the compatible DEFMACRO,Jon L White
- Re: Definition Syntax,Bill Long
- [no subject],Jon L White
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- Re: & as a reader macro.,Dave Andre
- Re: New argument-list syntax proposal.,Allan C. Wechsler
- Re: Everybody and his brother is a language designer.,Allan C. Wechsler
- [no subject],Howard I . Cannon
- Re: (OPTIONAL ...) &RELATED-ISSUES,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: (OPTIONAL ...) &RELATED-ISSUES,Glenn S . Burke
- Re: Meta-Flame about flaming: Reply to ACW,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: parsing,Earl A . Killian
- [no subject],Daniel L. Weinreb
- Re: (Spurious argumentation),Bruce E . Edwards
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- [no subject],Richard M. Stallman
- Re: spurious argumentation.,Bruce E . Edwards
- Re: spurious argumentation.,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: spurious argumentation.,Robert H . Berman
- Re: More concrete remarks on &keywords...,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Language design online,Jonathan Lettvin
- Re: Language design online,Jeffrey Shrager
- Re: symbols and printed representation,George J . Carrette
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- Re: [This reply went to SHRAGE@WHARTON-10],Kent M . Pitman
- Re: [RMS: forwarded],Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Standardization,George J . Carrette
- Re: Standardization,Deutsch at PARC-MAXC
- Re: Standardization,Jeffrey Shrager
- Re: [SHRAGE: Standardization],Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Lisp Compatibility, Lisp differences,Masinter at PARC-MAXC
- [no subject],Richard J . Fateman
- [no subject],Jeffrey P . Golden
- Re: Getting act together on strings,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Getting act together on strings,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: SLightly unwarranted flame,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: STRING subsequencing functions, etc,Jon L White
- Re: Foot-in-mouth disease,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Fence posts?,Jon L White
- Re: Gronked Quux,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: [DWS: LISP info requested],Earl A . Killian
- Re: [DWS: LISP info requested],George J . Carrette
- Re: [DWS: LISP info requested],JWALKER at BBNA
- Re: Z-80 Lisp,Bruce Roberts
- [no subject],CSVAX . fateman at Berkeley
- Re: The utility of readmacros in converting infix expressions.,George J . Carrette
- Re: The utility of readmacros in converting infix expressions., Jeffrey Shrager
- Re: timings,Charles Frankston
- Re: shrage's APL parsing problems,HGBaker . Symbolics at MIT-Multics
- Re: mouse explanation line in sys 300A, 65.0,Daniel G. Shapiro
- Re: Faculty Positions at Utah,Martin.Griss
- Re: fix,fixr,Richard J . Fateman
- Re: Data-types for "descending" during copying,Jon L White
- Re: Data-types for "descending" during copying,Masinter at PARC-MAXC
- Re: LISP security query,Barry Margolin
- Re: LISP security query,George J . Carrette
- Re: LISP security query, Jeffrey Shrager
- Re: lisp security,David A . Moon
- Re: lisp security,Deutsch at PARC-MAXC
- Re: Proposed extension to DOLIST, DOTIMES,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Proposed extension to DOLIST, DOTIMES,David A. Moon
- Re: Proposed extension to DOLIST, DOTIMES,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: Return value from DOLIST, DOTIMES,Robert W . Kerns
- Re: DOLIST, with index variable,Jon L White
- Re: Splicing macro's & CGOL.,George J . Carrette
- Re: Splicing macro's & CGOL.,David A . Moon
- Re: Splicing macro's & CGOL.,George J . Carrette
- Re: Splicing macros & CGOL,Jon L White
- Re: Proposed mildly incompatible change to MULTIPLE-VALUE(-BIND),Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Proposed mildly incompatible change to MULTIPLE-VALUE(-BIND),David A . Moon
- Re: Proposed mildly incompatible change to MULTIPLE-VALUE(-BIND),Jon L White
- Re: Proposed mildly incompatible change to MULTIPLE-VALUE(-BIND),Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: maclisp format query,Glenn S . Burke
- Re: New Maclisp mailing lists,Kent M . Pitman
- [no subject],David L . Andre
- [no subject],Daniel L . Weinreb
- [no subject],David L . Andre
- [no subject],Daniel L . Weinreb
- [no subject],David L . Andre
- [no subject],Carl W . Hoffman
- please add me to the mailing list,Bill Vaughan
- please add me to the mailing list,Bill Vaughan
- Mailing-list additions,Kent M . Pitman
- Re: Lisp macros,RG
- franz lisp & NIL,Bill Vaughan
- MAILING LIST,STOUTEMYER at UTAH-20
- OPENF,Daniel L . Weinreb
- [no subject],Richard C . Waters
- [no subject],Richard C . Waters
- DICK@ML's #, problems,Kent M . Pitman
- [no subject],JL at MIT-MC
- Found in the Boston Globe,Benson I . Margulies at MIT-Multics
- Intra-dialect Lisp translation,Lars S . Hornfeldt
- intra-dialect Lisp translation,Tim Finin
- Destructuring considered harmful,DILL at CMU-20C
- Reply to DESTRUCTURING considered harmfull.,George J . Carrette
- Reply to DESTRUCTURING considered harmfull.,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Reply to DESTRUCTURING considered harmfull.,George J . Carrette
- Reply to reply to DESTRUCTURING C.H.,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Variable binding,George J . Carrette
- [no subject],RMS
- [no subject],RMS
- [no subject],Jon L White
- Binding functions vs packages.,Richard M . Stallman
- Binding functions vs packages.,George J . Carrette
- Variable binding discipline,Richard M . Stallman
- Re: Variable binding discipline,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- LABELS,David A . Moon
- nested function definitions interfering with extensibility.,Richard M . Stallman
- NCONC and LAST of locatives,GOSPER at PARC-MAXC
- NCONC and LAST of locatives,George J . Carrette
- NCONC and LAST of locatives,David A . Moon
- NCONC and LAST of locatives,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: NCONC and LAST of locatives,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Antecedent, what's thy name?,GOSPER at PARC-MAXC
- [no subject],William A . Kornfeld
- Antecedents,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- [no subject],Daniel L . Weinreb
- [no subject],David Chapman
- LOGLAN,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- more about SEQ,David Chapman
- MACROEXPAND and related functions,Jon L White
- hi-multics is back,Bill Vaughan
- GENLOCAL,Jon L White
- GENLOCAL,David A . Moon
- GENSYM/GENTEMP/GENLOCAL,Robert W . Kerns
- GENSYM/GENTEMP/GENLOCAL,David A . Moon
- My previous note,Robert W . Kerns
- Why "uninterned" doesn't mean forever, or GENSYMs away!,Jon L White
- GENSYM/GENTEMP,Kent M . Pitman
- GENSYM/GENTEMP,Alan Bawden
- GENSYM in MacLisp,Robert W . Kerns
- GEN(whatever),L170DD60
- [no subject],David Chapman
- Lexical variables,Richard M . Stallman
- Suggested new lambda-list syntax,Richard M . Stallman
- Suggested new lambda-list syntax,George J . Carrette
- Re: Suggested new lambda-list syntax,Scott . Fahlman at CMU-10A
- Suggested new lambda-list syntax,David A . Moon
- Suggested new lambda-list syntax,Jon L White
- Re: Suggested new lambda-list syntax,Mark L . Miller
- Suggested new lambda-list syntax,Mark L . Miller
- Suggested new lambda-list syntax,Deutsch at PARC-MAXC
- Lambda List Syntax,Bill Long
- Lists for REST, OPTIONAL and AUX look nice,Richard M . Stallman
- [no subject],Richard M . Stallman
- Proposed new lambda-list syntax,David A . Moon
- &NO,Alan Bawden
- About &parsers,Kent M . Pitman
- About &parsers,Daniel L . Weinreb
- About &parsers,George J . Carrette
- implementation of rational numbers,William A . Kornfeld
- Re: implementation of rational numbers,Deutsch at PARC-MAXC
- implementation of rational numbers,Daniel L . Weinreb
- Re: fast gcd,RWG
- rational arithmetic,HGBaker . Symbolics at MIT-Multics
- LAMBDA syntax counter-proposal,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- LAMBDA syntax counter-proposal,Daniel L . Weinreb
- LAMBDA syntax counter-proposal,David A . Moon
- Re: LAMBDA syntax counter-proposal,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- LAMBDA syntax counter-proposal,Earl A . Killian
- P.S. to previous message (LAMBDA list counter-proposal),Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- LAMBDA syntax counter-counter-proposal,Earl A . Killian
- B.S.,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- LAMBDA proposals and counter-proposals,Kent M . Pitman
- LAMBDA proposals and counter-proposals,Earl A . Killian
- LAMBDA proposals and counter-proposals,Kent M . Pitman
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- Mary had a moby lambda,Bill Gosper
- Mary had a moby lambda,Daniel L . Weinreb
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- Forwarding lost copy of mail from BENSON,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- LAMBDA extension,Masinter at PARC-MAXC
- NIL LET.,George J . Carrette
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- History of Lisp macros,Alan Bawden
- Re: History of Lisp macros,Deutsch at PARC-MAXC
- [no subject],Richard M . Stallman
- Macros in Interlisp,MASINTER at PARC-MAXC
- macros in Interlisp,Masinter at PARC-MAXC
- [no subject],Richard M . Stallman
- InterLISP Macros,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: InterLISP Macros,Masinter at PARC-MAXC
- InterLISP Macros,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- [no subject],Eric Benson
- "Until you try to implement it",Richard M . Stallman
- Re: "Until you try to implement it",Eric Benson
- [no subject],George J . Carrette
- c*r,John Foderaro
- More pointless hot air about cdaddaddaadddaadaaddddaaar,Alan Bawden
- CDDADADADADADADAAADADADADAR,Allan C . Wechsler
- a lisp without cons is not like a day without sunshine,CSVAX . fateman at Berkeley
- A day without sunshine,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- [no subject],Kent M . Pitman
- Query,Alan Bawden
- Re: Query,John Foderaro
- C*R and language design,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- CR,Kim . fateman at Berkeley
- Re: CR,VaughanW . REFLECS at HI-Multics
- [no subject],Jeffrey P . Golden
- [no subject],Richard M . Stallman
- Multiple-valued SQRT,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- Re: Multiple-valued SQRT,CSVAX . fateman at Berkeley
- C*R improvement,Scott . Fahlman at CMU-10A
- More Lisp History Trivia Quiz,Masinter at PARC-MAXC
- More Lisp History Trivia Quiz,George J . Carrette
- Tail Recursion,Dick Gabriel
- Re: Tail Recursion,Tony Hearn
- backquote query,Don Morrison
- backquote query,Robert W . Kerns
- backquote query,Robert W . Kerns
- backquote trivia, for you history fans.,George J . Carrette
- Backquote depth,Guy . Steele at CMU-10A
- clarification regarding backquote query,Don Morrison
- 'backquote' actions,Jon L White
- minilisp,JoSH
- Re: minilisp,kwh
- Interlisp and MacLisp,2Lt Eric J . Swenson
- Two little suggestions for macroexpansion,Jon L White
- Two little suggestions for macroexpansion,David A . Moon
- Re: Two little suggestions for macroexpansion,Fahlman at CMU-20C
- Those two little suggestions for macroexpansion,Kent M . Pitman
- Comparison of "lambda-macros" and my "Two little suggestions ...",Jon L White
- The format ((MACRO . f) ...),Jon L White
- Incredible co-incidence about the format ((MACRO . f) ...),Jon L White
- Incredible co-incidence about the format ((MACRO . f) ...),HIC at SCRC-TENEX
- Interlisp and MacLisp (almost),2Lt Eric J . Swenson
- Interlisp and MacLisp (almost),Tim Finin
- &mumbles at all levels.,Alan Bawden
- &mumbles at all levels.,David L . Andre
- &mumbles at all levels.,George J . Carrette
- Re: &mumbles at all levels -- BIND-ARGS,JonL at PARC-MAXC
- UNLESS -- or something like it.,Robert P . Krajewski
- Re: UNLESS -- or something like it.,John Foderaro
- LOOP CONTINUE STATEMENT,Matt BenDaniel
- LOOP CONTINUE STATEMENT,MOON at SCRC-TENEX
- LOOP CONTINUE STATEMENT,Matt BenDaniel
- Call For Papers,Bill Vaughan
- function cells,Julian Padget
- Re: function cells,Deutsch . PA
- Re: function cells,Bobrow . PA
- Function cells,TIM
* Re: Function cells,Bobrow . PA - Re: Function cells,Eric Benson
- Re: Function cells,Deutsch . PA
- Re: Function cells,Julian Padget
- Re: Function cells,Bobrow . PA
- Function cells,ZVONA
* Function cells,Robert W . Kerns - Function cells,David A . Moon
- Function cells,ZVONA
- Re: Function cells,John Foderaro
- Re: Function cells,Julian Padget
- Function cells.,George J . Carrette
- Zippy the mailer, or ... are we on the net yet?,George J . Carrette
- Administrative Note,Kent M . Pitman
- Function Cells -- the history,JonL . pa
- your note on Function Cells.,George J . Carrette
- Addition to list,SAE-ADA
- Backquote history,MASINTER . PA
- Backquote history,Alan Bawden
- Backquote history,Kent M Pitman
- Re: Backquote history,masinter . pa
- Backquote history,Allan C. Wechsler
- Backquote history,Alan Bawden
- [GJS: Backquote history],Kent M Pitman
- Backquote,Drew McDermott
- History of "backquote" macro,JONL . PA
- eval-while-possible,Christopher Fry
- where to donate cans????,Michael J . Beckerle
- Info request: Microcomputer file transfer protocols for PC & UNIX,Daniel C . Cheng
- mail list addition,LCG . GREEN
- [MJackson.Wbst: Why Your Pascal and Modula-2 Programs Don't Work],JonL . pa
- Benchmark - PERQ CL vs Apollo T,Skef Wholey
- Benchmark - PERQ CL vs Apollo T,Charles Dolan
- Concept-LNZ manual,Michael M . How
- IBM PC Software Development Positions Available,Daniel C . Cheng
- UCLA Perq,Joseph . Ginder
- Tomos Moped,Michael J . Beckerle
- televideo terminal help,DShevitz
- 6871 partners wanted,Michael J . Beckerle
- defsubst in Maclisp,Barry Margolin
- defsubst in Maclisp,Kent M Pitman
- Modem help!,Michael D. O'Keefe
- Berkeley Apartment to let for July,Steve Heller
- Graduation tickets for Sale,Johnathan Devine
- [no subject],Ben Moreland
- I have a car...,leifer
- telescope drive equipment for sale,Mark L. Lambert
- Expert System / Graphics Opportunities Available,Steve Heller
- [no subject],Communications Satellite
- Scheme availability,on ERCC DEC-10
- Lost Notebook,John T. Maeda
- 68000 kit,David C . Anderson
- Tae Kwon Do Demonstration,Steve Heller
- Availbility of Kana font.,Robert H . Kassel
- (TRACE q1 q2 ... ) patterns,Harold Carr
- Spring Dance,Gays at MIT
- Re: I agree that it should not be as rigidly defined as APL,Jeffrey Shrager
- Re: LISP machine diamonds,Jeffrey Shrager
- Re: control vs constraint,Jeffrey Shrager
- [no subject],Jeffrey Shrager
- Re: An amusing sidenote to the kwote controversy:,Jeffrey Shrager
- [no subject],Unknown
- Lisp for PR1ME needed,Steve Platt
- Opps -- that's LET (I've been told) -- "never mind",Jeffrey Shrager
- Avoiding recomputation or recapitulation: (g x x),Jeffrey Shrager
- interlisp-like primitives in lisp,Steve Platt
Mail converted by MHonArc