semisimple category in nLab (original) (raw)
Contents
Context
Category theory
- category
- functor
- natural transformation
- Cat
- universal construction
- Yoneda lemma
- Isbell duality
- Grothendieck construction
- adjoint functor theorem
- monadicity theorem
- adjoint lifting theorem
- Tannaka duality
- Gabriel-Ulmer duality
- small object argument
- Freyd-Mitchell embedding theorem
- relation between type theory and category theory
- sheaf and topos theory
- enriched category theory
- higher category theory
- applications of (higher) category theory
Additive and abelian categories
Contents
Idea
A semisimple category is a category in which each object is a direct sum of finitely many simple objects, and all such direct sums exist.
Definition
Alternatively, at least over an algebraically closed ground field kk:
Definition
(semisimple linear category)
A linear category (that is, a category enriched over Vect, cf. tensor category) is called semisimple if:
- it has finite biproducts
(usually called ‘direct sums’), - idempotents split
(so we say that it ‘has subobjects’ or, perhaps better, ‘has retracts’), - there exist objects X iX_i labeled by an index set II such that
- for any pair i,ji, j of indices we have an isomorphism
(1)Hom(X i,X j)≅δ ijk, Hom(X_i, X_j) \;\cong\; \delta_{i j} k \,,
where δ\delta denotes the Kronecker delta and kk the ground field
(such objects are called simple), - for any pair of objects V,WV,\,W, the natural composition map
(2)⨁ i∈IHom(V,X i)⊗Hom(X i,W)⟶Hom(V,W) \bigoplus_{i \in I} \, Hom(V, X_i) \,\otimes\, Hom(X_i, W) \longrightarrow Hom(V, W)
is an isomorphism.
(If the field kk is not algebraically closed, a simple object XX can have a finite-dimensional division algebra other than kk itself as its endomorphism algebra.)
- for any pair i,ji, j of indices we have an isomorphism
(e.g. Müger (2003, p. 6))
Proposition
(direct sum decomposition into simple objects)
Definition implies that every object VV is a direct sum of simple objects X iX_i.
Proof
The third item of the definition is equivalent to stipulating that the vector space Hom(X i,V)Hom(X_i, V) is in canonical duality with the vector space Hom(V,X i)Hom(V, X_i). Indeed, we have:
- a pairing
Hom(V,X i)⊗Hom(X i,V) ⟶ Hom(X i,X i) ≃ k f⊗g ↦ f∘g, \begin{array}{ccc} Hom(V, X_i) \,\otimes\, Hom(X_i, V) & \longrightarrow & Hom(X_i, X_i) &\simeq& k \\ f \,\otimes\, g &\mapsto& f \,\circ\, g \mathrlap{\,,} \end{array}
where on the right we used (1), - a copairing
k⋅Id B↪Hom(V,V)⟶Hom(X i,V)⊗Hom(V,X i), k \cdot Id_B \;\hookrightarrow\; Hom(V,V) \longrightarrow Hom(X_i, V) \otimes Hom(V, X_i) \mathrlap{\,,}
where on the right we used (2),
and one checks that these satisfy the triangle identities and as such exhibit dual vector spaces.
Hence if we choose a linear basis
{a i,p:X i→V} \big\{ a_{i,p} \,\colon\, X_i \rightarrow V \big\}
for each vector space Hom(X i,V)Hom(X_i, V), we get a corresponding dual basis
{a i p:V→X i} \big\{ a_i^p \,\colon\, V \rightarrow X_i \big\}
satisfying
a i pa j,q=δ ijδ p qand∑ i,pa i,pa i p=id V. a_i^p a_{j,q} \;=\; \delta_{i j} \delta_p^q \;\;\; \text{and} \;\;\; \sum_{i,p} a_{i,p} a_i^p \;=\; \id_V \mathrlap{\,.}
This says precisely that VV has been expressed as a direct sum of the X iX_i.
Examples
- The archetypical simple example is FinDimVect itself, the category of finite dimensional vector spaces over some ground field kk. This has a single isomorphism class of simple objects: given by kk itself.
- The category of finite-dimensional complex representations of a compact Lie group GG is semisimple, with the simple objects being precisely the irreducible representations (this is the content of Schur's lemma). If GG is not a compact Lie group, one needs to pass from the concept of ‘direct sum’ to ‘direct integral’.
- Every fusion category is a semisimple category.
References
Various alternative definitions of semisimple category appear in the literature, and a number are compared here:
- James Bailie, Semisimple categories (pdf.
For example, he compares a definition of “abelian semisimple category”(an abelian category where every object is a direct sum of a possibly infinite number of simple objects) with “Müger semisimple” categories as discussed here:
- Michael Müger, p. 6 in: From Subfactors to Categories and Topology I. Frobenius algebras in and Morita equivalence classes of tensor categories, J. Pure Appl. Alg. 180 (2003) 81-157 [arXiv:math/0111204, doi:10.1016/S0022-4049(02)00247-5]
There is a related discussion on the nForum and a discussion on MathOverflow.
Last revised on June 18, 2023 at 18:01:07. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.