THE FATAL RAILWAY DISASTER AT BRIDGEWATER. - FURTHER DETAILS. FINDING OF THE BODIES. - The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954) - 24 Jul 1886 (original) (raw)
Sat 24 Jul 1886 - The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954)
Page 3 - THE FATAL RAILWAY DISASTER AT BRIDGEWATER.
THE FATAL RAILWAY DISASTER
All doubts as to the fate of the unfortunate
men, Turner and Shaw, were set at rest this
morning, when a telegram was received in
town to say that both the bodies had been
found at daylight. A party of polite, con
sisting of Constables Booton, Oakes, Mont-
gomery, Thorne, Quintal, and Hogan set
to work to thoroughly drag the river, with
drags that had been obtained from the
Marine Board in town. About 8 o'clock
the body of Turner was caught by Con-
stable Quintal, and raiscd to the surface,
and a few minutes after, Sergeant Oakes'
drag caught the clothes of the unfortunate
fireman, Wm. Shaw. Both bodies were very
much disfigured, the whole of Shaw's face
being eaten away by crabs and eels, the
former literally swarming on both the bodies.
Turner's body when found also had the face
very much disfigured, but there was a
frightful cut on the right side of the face,
and the whole cheek had bout torn away.
Blood was also oozing from the car, showing
that he must have sustained a fearful blow,
and probably was insensible before he
touched the water. It is imagined
that the unfortunate man, in his hurry
to get out of the carriage, missed his
footing, and fell down between the cross-
ties, which support the rails, striking his
head a fearful blow upon one of the heavy
girders underneath. The dragging appa
ratus had all to be brought up from town by
the relief train, and the police complain very
much of the inadequacy of the life-saving
apparatus at North Bridgewater. On Thurs
day night, just after the accident, one of the
bodies was caught with the local police
drag, but the wretched contrivance would
not hold, and further attempts had to be
abandoned until daylight.
It is a curious fact that both bodies were
found exactly under the spot where the acci-
dent happened, right in the steamer chan-
nel, although there was a very strong
current running down at the time. This is
probably owing to a strong under-cur-
rent which seems to prevail there. The
water at this spot is about 17ft deep, and
the bottom [illegible] from [illegible] a depth of 30ft,
of soft [illegible] has been [illegible] which would quickly
have buried [illegible] left on the bottom
for any [illegible] of time. There have been
numerous fatal accidents on the bridge, and
in the majority of cases the bodies have never
THE RESCUE OF MR. WM. GUNN.
Mr. Wm. Gunn, of Green Ponds, seems
to have bad the narrowest escape of all, for
when rescued from the water he was in an
insensible condition. It seems that imme-
diately after the accident, Constable Booton
and Mesars. Ricketts, Milligan, aud McVilly
launched a boat and rowed round to the
steamer channel, for the purpose of picking
up anyone who had fallen into the water.
Upon getting round the steamer guides, they
saw Mr. Gunn struggling in the water, and
just as they rowed up to him he sank for
the aost time. One of the occupants of
the boat managed to reach over and
catch the end of a large comforter which
Mr. Gunn wore, and which was just
disappearing from sight, and by this means
he was raised to the surface and got into the
boat He was taken ashore in an insensible
condition, but several of the constables pre-
sent act to work to restore animation, ac-
cording to-Dr. Sylvester's method, which is
included amongst the instructions issued by
the Royal Humane Society. After trying
for a quarter of an hour their efforts were
rewarded with signs of returning animation,
and before long Mr. Gunn was so far re-
covered, as to be able to go to
bed. As he is a man of over 80 years
of age, the case may be regarded as
being rather critical, although for the
present, he is considered out of danger. Mr.
Gunn states that when he felt the shock of
the collision of the engine with the viaduct,
he picked up his carpet bag and rushed to
the carriage door, having no idea where the
train was. Upon stepping over the platform,
he fell over the side of the viaduct into the
river. Still holding his bag with one hand,
he tried to swim to the piles, to hold on
till rescued, but his strength proved insuffi-
cient for the attempt, which would have
been no mean accomplishment for tho most
practised swimmer. He remembers nothing
more than that he felt himself sinking, and
came to in the Derwent Hotel. His rescue was
effected just in time, for had another minute
elapsed he would have been beyond the
reach of human aid. This case is only one
amongst the thousands which illustrates the
value of the endeavours of the Royal Humane
Society to diffuse knowledge amongst the
people, to teach them how to act in cases of
Mr. Albert McVilly, who resides a few
yards from the end of the bridge, states that
when the express came down on the night
of the accident, he noticed that the noise she
made in passing on to the swing bridge was
different from usual, a peculiar knocking
sound being noticeable, as though a wheel
were loose. This statement is also borne out
by several people who noticed the train
passing. Whether or not this has anything
to do with the accident, or whether it is only
a flight of imagination, cannot be decided,
and must depend in a great measure upon
The swing bridge, which was the cause of
the accident, is a substantial iron structure
working upon a wooden foundation. It was
fastened in its place for railway traffic by
"pawls," or heavy iron catches, which
dropped into seats on the end of the bridge,
one being situated on each end of the bridge.
On the southern end there were two large
screws, one on each side, the end of the
screw fitting into a sort of cup, which held
it fast. Mr. Edward Roach, the station
master, states that he last examined the
bridge about 5 p.m. on the night of the
accident, when he closed it after allowing a
craft to pass. Two trains passed over be-
tween that time and 8 o clock, when the
express came down, namely the " midland"
train from Hobart, and the "ordinary"
train from Launceston. From the marks on
the cross-ties on the bridge, it appears
that the bridge was 1ft.9in. out of
place when the engine got off, though
when the engine had got over the bridge
swung until the deflection from the line of
rail was nearly 2yds. From the marks it
seems as though the engine had continued
on the line until the end of the bridge had
been reached, for there were marks on the
bridge which would correspond to the wheels
of the engine. The marks of where the first
and second carriages went off the rail, can be
distinctly seen. They must have jumped
off directly the engine struck the other side
of the gap. The movement of the bridge must
have been after the engine was upon it, and
before the first carnage reached it, and this
would account for the gradually increasing
jolts which were felt by the passengers. All
the deckwork, which consists of 3/4-inch plank-
ing, was uninjured at tho southern end,
Which would not be the case if the engine
had left the rails and the bridge. There is
a distinct mark about half-way across where
the flange of the first carriage got off, and a
cut on one of the longitudinal stringers,
which support the cross ties, and a mark at
a corresponding distance on the cross-ties
themselves show where the engine first ran
off. The stringer was about two feet below
the level of the line, and the heavy cant
thus given the engine caused it to turn over.
It is a noteworthy fact that the cngine went
about its own length in the position de-
scribed, and then it turned clean over,
providentially falling on top of one of the
steamer guides which have been erected
there. The top of the guide, which is con-
structed of 12in. baulks of timber, has been
split and smashed, but the timber and bolts
have been able to withstand the strain, and
support the weight of the engine, some 25 tons.
But for this, there would have been nothing
to prevent the whole train from all going
into tho water, and the result would have
been that about 25 people would have been
drowned like rats in a box. The engine now
lies upside down, upon the steamer guide,
and is very much damaged, though the exact
Active operations were being carried out
yesterday by a large gang of workmen,
under the superintendence of Messrs. Grant
and Cundy, in clearing the line. They were
so far successful, that before evening the
long Clemonson carriage, and the short
second-class carriage and guard's van had
been got upon the line again. The tender
will also be got on very soon. It is intended
to take steps to parbuckle tho engine back
upon the line, but before this is rendered
necessary, the line will be open again tor
traffic. Although the bridge was rendered
impassable by the accident, traffic, though
delayed, was not interrupted, as trains met
upon each side of the bridge, and passengers
were transferred from one to the other,
and the excellence of the arrangements,
in such trying circumstances, reflects the
greatest credit upon Mr. C. H. Grant, the
general manager of the line.
From the statement of witnesses of the
accident and passengers by the train, it ap-
pears that there is still a person who cannot be
accounted for. t,It is said that he got into
the train at Campania, and has not been seen
since. He is described as being about 40
years of ago, 5 ft. 7in. high, medium build,
with bushy whiskers and moustache, and
under-lip shaved. He was dressed in a dark
suit, and wore a hard hat, and was an Eng
THE DEATH OF THE FIREMAN.
A young man named Mason, residing at
North Bridgewater, who was one of the first
on the scene of the accident, informs us that
he could have saved the life of Shaw, the
unfortunate fireman, had there been any life-
saving apparatus at hand, as he was seen
struggling in the water for several minutes.
An inquest was held yesterday at the
Railway Hotel, North Bridgewater, into to
circumstances of the deaths of the unfortu-
nate men, William Shaw and Daniel Turner,
Whose bodies were recovered during the
Mr. Wm. Gunn, Warden, presided as
coroner, and the following jury were em-
panelled: - Mr. Thomas Stanfield, foreman,
and Messrs. Robert James, John Wise, V.
R. Elliston, W. Richardson, Alex. Brock,
Mr. James Fincham, Engineer-in-Chief,
and Mr. C. H. Grant, manager of the
T.M.L.R., were present, as was also Sub-
Inspector Hedberg, Superintendent of Terri
The following evidence was taken:
John N. Robertson deposed that he was
an engine driver on the Main Line, and was
so on the night of the 22nd. On that night
he was driving the up express from Launces-
ton to Hobart. On the journey he found
nothing wrong with the engine, as she ran
quite smoothly, and everything went right
until arriving at the Bridgewater viaduct.
After going round the curve, he noticed the
all-right signals on the bridge, and, in
accordance with custom, he let the engine go
gently over, he having received instructions a
short time ago to that effect. On approaching
the south end of the swing bridge, he found
the engine was off the road. When she
got off the bridge the engine gave a few
bounces, and immediately canted over. The
CORONER : You Wish the jury to infer that
the engine left the line on the swing bridge?
Witness: Immediately after; I have every
reason to believe she kept on the rails right
across the swing bridge. The CORONER : If
the bridge had not been closed properly the
accident would have occurred sooner?
Witness: Yes; the rails may have been
right, but the vibration may have moved the
bridge over. CORONER: In your opinion was
the bridge faulty and insecure? Witness : No;
I have always found it perfectly safe. He had
viewed the body of Wm. Shaw, who had
acted with him on the engine. When the
accident took place Shaw dropped into the
water. He could not say whether he re-
ceived any injury before/he fell into the
water. He could not say what age he was.
By the Foreman : The engine was not
going more than five miles an hour when she
got on the bridge. He was not aware that
there was a notice on the bridge cautioning
drivers not to exceed four miles an hour.
To the best of his knowledge the engine did
not leave the rails until across the bridge.
He had not examined the bridge since the
accident, and was not aware of any faulty
rails being on it. He had never experienced
anything unusual in crossing the bridge
either in regard to noise or motion.
By Mr. Brook He had special instruc-
tions to drive slowly over the bridge. He
had always done so, and on the present
occasion was driving slower than usual. The
reason for this was that the guard's brake
seemed foul, and did not come off the wheels
as quickly as usual. The guard always used
the brakes coming down tho incline to the
bridge. He did not think that had any-
thing to do with the accident.
By the CORONER : The night was very
dark indeed. He saw the stationmaster's
signal at the gate at the end of the bridge.
It was "all right," as also was the signal on
the semaphore, some distance back on the
(At the request of the foreman, the jury
then went and viewed the bridge and the
Charles Meredith deposed he was em-
ployed on the Main Line Railway as guard.
On the 22nd inst., he was travelling on the
"up" express train to Hobart. He found
nothing at all wrong on the train until upon
arrival at North Bridgewater. The brakes
were all in good working order, and he put
them on, coming into North Bridgewater, as
there was a heavy incline there. He had
been running as guard for seven years, He
put on the brake as usual. The train was
travelling about six miles an hour, just be-
fore going into the swing bridge. For some
reason, probably to an order they had re-
ceived lately to run very slowly around
curves, less than 10 chains radius, and they
had been lately running much steadier than
they formerly did. After passing the points
at North Bridgewater siding, contrary
to his usual custom, ho again used the con-
tinuous brakes. Ha had some sort of pre-
sentiment, which induced him to use his
brakes more than usual. From the rate of
speed the train was going, the train would
have pulled up, under ordinary circum-
stances, just after passing the bridge if the
engine-driver had so wished. The brakes
were perfectly free when the train got on
the bridge. There were about 20 passengers
in the train, including a number of children.
The signals on the semaphore at the gates
and at the swing bridge were green, which
indicated "all right." The train was
running splendidly until the accident actually
By the Foreman : He was not aware that
there was a notice board on the causeway
cautioning drivers not to exceed four miles
an hour over the bridge. Ho always thought
it was six miles an hour. He was not aware
of a faulty rail or fish-plute in the bridge,
but had always found it in excellent order.
He had never felt any unusual bumping
sensation on the bridge. As it was an iron
bridge, the noise was always worse than any
shock which might be felt. He had seen
the bridge in the presence of the jury, and
undoubtedly the marks on the bridge were
caused by the carriages. It was quite pos-
sible that the engine should have kept on
the rails, and the carriages run off, as the
oscillation would have been sufficient to
cause the bridge to open. It was not correct
that his brakes had fouled. There was a
distance of between 10 or 11 feet between
the lending wheels of the first carriage and
the training wheels of the tender, and he
thought it probable that the bridge had
shifted before the carriages got on it.
By Mr. Fincham :- The signal on the
bridge would show "all right" if the rails
were three inches foul. The signal was an
auxiliary one, and was intended for both
railway and river traffic. When the bridge
was open for river traffic, a danger signal (a
red light) was shown, for both up and down
trains. If the danger signal showed on the
bridge, it would be regarded independently
of other signals. They chiefly depended on
the stationmaster's signal at North Bridge-
water, as he was in charge of the bridge, and
consequently was the most reliable.
By Mr. Brock: It was usual to watch all
signals. The stationmaster's signal was visible
at a greater distance than the Bridgewater
signal. The train would not pass on to the
bridge on any account without the station
master's signal that the bridge was "all
right." On the night of the accident he saw
the "all right" signal. He had taken more
than usual precautions before going on to
the bridge. He was not in a position to say
how the light would show if the bridge was
two or three inches open.
Edward Roach deposed he was station-
master, and caretaker of the bridge at North
Bridgewater, and he was so on the night of
the accident. The bridge was last opened
on that night at five minutes to 5. The midland
train from Hobart, and the ordinary train from
Launceston passed over it after that time, the
midland train being the last of the two.
He had not been on the bridge after the
midland train passed, or after a sailing boat
had been passed through up to New Norfolk
about 4'45. Before he left the bridge he
had seen that the "pawls" were in their
places, on the south side, and also on the north
side. On the south side of the bridge there were
two screws that assisted to hold the bridge
in position. He was quite sure as to his
having secured the screws. The train passed
at its usual rate of speed for that part of the
line. There was a green light on the bridge
which was fixed. This would show red if
the bridge was open. He could tell by the
light if the bridge was only open about 3in.
being so used to it. He saw nothing unusual
to show that there was anything the matter
with the bridge. He had been bridge keeper
for four years. It was part of his duty to see
that the rails on the bridge were in work-
ing order, and report their condition to the
ganger. He had never had occasion to re-
port for the lat six months. The rails
were spiked down to the cross ties, and were
coupled with the customary fish plates. He
had not the remotest idea us to how the
train went off the line. He did not go over
the bridge after every train passed re-
gularly, as he could see from his door a
"pawl" was out of place. When he crossed
the bridge at 5 o'clock, it worked exactly as
By the Foreman: If anyone undid the
screws without disengaging the "pawls," it
would not make much difference in the
security of the bridge. On the southern side
of the bridge the "pawl" had been carried
away altogether, and the screw must have
been forced out of the cup that received its
head. He had noticed a bumping noise
whilst the train was on the bridge, which
was perfectly level with the permanent way.
He had not seen anyone on the bridge after
he locked it. The bumping was caused by
the swing bridge being a little clear of the
plates underneath. Had anything gone
wrong with the bridge it would have been
impossible to open it. The usual rate of
speed was six to seven miles an hour on the
bridge. The train seemed to be going about
six miles. He had never seen a notice
board on the other side of the bridge caution-
ing drivers to drive at four miles an hour.
By Mr. Fincham: The screws were gener-
ally put hard down, and then eased off. If
the screws were hard down, the end of the
bridge would have to be lifted before they
By Mr. Grant: The "pawls" had been
substituted for the fish plates, which had
Thomas Smith deposed that he was a
labouror, and had been lately a digger, and
was a passenger on the express on the 22nd
inst. He had been travelling as a mate with
the deceased, Daniel Turner, who was of no
particular profession, but was generally a
bushman. He was in the same carriage with
him. When the shock of the carriage was
felt, Turner must have jumped off the train,
and fallen through the cross-ties, as he never
saw him afterwards. He was about 31 or
By Mr. Brock: He never noticed anything
unusual on the line. They had only arrived
in the colony last Sunday, and had been up
to Launceston, and were coming back.
Charles Cameron Nairn, resident engineer
of the T.M.L. Railway, deposed that he last
inspected the swing bridge on last Thursday
week, and found everything in perfect order.
Within the last 18 mouths no fresh ballast
had been put on the short end of the bridge.
He had the bridge on that occasion swung,
and found that the pawls worked freely.
By Mr. Fincham: He showed a mark on
the timber beside the slot for the "pawls"
on the south side, and he believed it to have
been caused by the underparing of the bogg-
wheels of the engine striking it. He did not
think it was an impression from the "powl."
The signal on the bridge was a fixed lamp,
and he thought the rails would have to be a
foot clear of each other before the danger
signal could be shown on the line. If the
rails were two or three inches foul, the "all-
right" signal would still show. The signal
was simply put there for river traffic.
By the foreman: He had been 14 years in
the service of the company, and had held
the position of resident engineer, which in-
cluded all the line, for three years. The
authorised rate of speed was under six miles
an hour over the bridge. He did not know
if there was any board at the south end
cautioning drivers as to the rate of
speed to be maintained at the bridge.
He had never heard of any complaints
as to faulty construction of the bridge. He
had had complaints from the ganger as to
its defects in the rails, but had always been
present when they were repaired. He had
men present on occasions when the train
had been passing over the swing bridge, but
he had never heard any unusual sound. He
had seen the bridge after the accident, and
had seen the marks of the wheels on the
boards, which he took to be the marks of the
carriage. He could not account for the
carriages having left the rails, and did not
know how the accident happened.
By a Juryman: There was no appreciable
deflection of the bridge when an engine went
By the Foreman: He had always found
Mr. Roach particularly careful in looking
By Mr. Fincham: Ho could not say
whether the notice hoard remained up until
the viaduct was re-laid with heavier rails.
The notice was put up as a general precau-
tion. Ha fancied it had been up after the
By a Juryman: The drivers could read
sufficient of the notice to to tell them the speed
to go at without pulling up.
By the CORONER: He believed Shaw was
By a Juryman: He considered the present
style of things better than the fish plates
that were used some years ago.
Thomas Boaton, a constable in the Terri-
torial Police, deposed that on Thursday
night he was present when the accident oc-
curred, being at the station in company with
Mr. Roach, who was holding the green light
as the train passed. Directly the train got
upon the swing bridge they heard a sort of
grating noise. He took the lamp out of Mr.
Roach's hand and ran down the bridge, and
heard the driver of the train calling out for a
boat. Ho was present when the two bodies
were recovered by the drags about 8 a.m.
yesterday. Both had been eaten very much
by crabs. Turner seemed to have an exten-
sive bruise on the side of the face. He heard
no crash when the engine went off, nothing
except a grating noise and the sound of
escaping steam. The train was going about
nine miles an hour when she passed witness,
who was standing about 50yds. from the
By the Foreman : He had often noticed a
bumping noise when the train was going over
the swing bridge. He took it to be caused by
the "pawls" jumping, as he had several
Mr. C. U. Grant, who was called in re-
sponse to a request of the foreman, deposed
that the authorised rate of speed over the
bridge had been four miles an hour until the
whole bridge bad been repaired. The bridge
was now relaid with 60lb. rails in place of
the old 40lb. ones, and he did not care what
speed they actually crossed the bridge at.
The notice referred to by the fireman had
been out of effect for some three years. It
had been replaced by a notice limiting the
speed round the Bridgewater curve to six
or eight miles an hour, on account of the
danger to the public in crossing the main
road. He had never received any complaint
about the bridge, though he had noticed the
peculiar bumping sound made by the
bridge. He was perfectly sure the rate of
speed, even if it was nine miles an hour,
had nothing to do with the accident,
and would not have caused the car-
riages, even if empty, to jump
the rails. He could form no idea
as to the cause of the accident, unless the
screws on the bridge had been maliciously
tampered with. He was of opinion that the
engine left the line first and the carriages
were thrown off by the subsequent shock.
The only way he could account for the acci-
dent was that the bridge had been tampered
with. The pawls "chattered" a little
when a train passed over, but did not jump
up and down, as stated by Constable Bastow.
This "chattering" would probably be caused
by the elasticity of the wooden formation of
This concluded the evidence.
The CORONER, in summing up, pointed out
to the jury that the accident was one of
those unfortunate occurrences in which no
blame was attachable to anybody. The
evidence, without the assistance of medical
testimony, left them in in no doubt as to the
manner in which the unfortunate men came
to their deaths. It appeared that there was
no blame attachable to Roach, the station-
master, and bridgekeeper, and the other
The jury, after a short retirement,brought
in a verdict to the effect that death had
resulted from an accident, and added a rider
to the effect that it would be advisable if
steps were taken to have the spaces between
the cross ties on the bridge boarded,