Taniyama-Shimura theorem (original) (raw)
For any natural number N≥1, define the modular group Γ0(N) to be the following subgroup of the group SL(2,ℤ) ofinteger coefficient matrices of determinant
1:
Γ0(N):={(abcd)∈SL(2,ℤ)|c≡0(modN)}. |
---|
Let ℍ* be the subset of the Riemann sphere consisting of all points in the upper half plane (i.e., complex numbers with strictlypositive imaginary part
), together with the rational numbers and the point at infinity. Then Γ0(N) acts on ℍ*, with group action given by the operation
Define X0(N) to be the quotient of ℍ* by the action ofΓ0(N). The quotient space X0(N) inherits a quotient topology and holomorphic structure from ℂ making it into a compact Riemann surface. (Note: ℍ* itself is not a Riemann surface; only the quotient X0(N) is.) By a general theorem in complex algebraic geometry, every compact Riemann surface admits a unique realization as a complex nonsingular
projective curve; in particular, X0(N) has such a realization, which by abuse of notation we will also denoteX0(N). This curve is defined over ℚ, although the proof of this fact is beyond the scope of this entry11Explicitly, the curveX0(N) is the unique nonsingular projective curve which has function field
equal to ℂ(j(z),j(Nz)), where j denotes the elliptic modular j–function. The curve X0(N) is essentially the algebraic curve defined by the polynomial equation ΦN(X,Y)=0 whereΦN is the modular polynomial
, with the caveat that this procedure yields singularities which must be resolved manually. The fact that ΦN has integer coefficients provides one proof thatX0(N) is defined over ℚ..
This theorem was first conjectured (in a much more precise, but equivalent formulation) by Taniyama, Shimura, and Weil in the 1970’s. It attracted considerable interest in the 1980’s when Frey [2] proposed that the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture implies Fermat’s Last Theorem. In 1995, Andrew Wiles [3] proved a special case of the Taniyama-Shimura theorem which was strong enough to yield a proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem. The full Taniyama-Shimura theorem was finally proved in 1997 by a team of a half-dozen mathematicians who, building on Wiles’s work, incrementally chipped away at the remaining cases until the full result was proved. As of this writing, the proof of the full theorem can still be found on http://abel.math.harvard.edu/ rtaylor/Richard Taylor’s preprints page.
References
- 1 Breuil, Christophe; Conrad, Brian; Diamond, Fred; Taylor, Richard; On the modularity of elliptic curves over Q: wild 3-adic exercises. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (2001), no. 4, 843–939
- 2 Frey, G. Links between stable elliptic curves and certain Diophantine equations
. Ann. Univ. Sarav. 1 (1986), 1–40.
- 3 Wiles, A. Modular elliptic curves and Fermat’s Last Theorem. Annals of Math. 141 (1995), 443–551.
Title | Taniyama-Shimura theorem |
---|---|
Canonical name | TaniyamaShimuraTheorem |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 12:16:27 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 12:16:27 |
Owner | djao (24) |
Last modified by | djao (24) |
Numerical id | 14 |
Author | djao (24) |
Entry type | Theorem |
Classification | msc 11F06 |
Classification | msc 14H52 |
Synonym | Taniyama-Shimura-Weil conjecture |
Synonym | Taniyama-Weil conjecture |
Synonym | Taniyama-Shimura conjecture |
Synonym | Taniyama-Shimura-Weil theorem |
Related topic | FermatsLastTheorem |
Related topic | ModularForms |