Issue 1170424: why should URL be required for all packages (original) (raw)
Issue1170424
Created on 2005-03-25 09:58 by jae, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (3) | ||
|---|---|---|
| msg24791 - (view) | Author: Jürgen A. Erhard (jae) | Date: 2005-03-25 09:58 |
| Annoying if you just want to roll an in-house package. | ||
| msg24792 - (view) | Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) *  |
Date: 2005-03-30 18:12 |
| Logged In: YES user_id=593130 Bugs are a discrepancy between intended/claimed behavior and actual behavior. Since this does not appear to report such a discrepancy, it does not appear to be a bug report. Please close and ask your question and make your comment on the Python discussion mailing list or newsgroup (comp.lang.python). | ||
| msg24793 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * |
Date: 2005-04-01 21:50 |
| Logged In: YES user_id=21627 In addition, the bug report is under-specified: Who says that an URL is required for all packages? It certainly is possible to have packages without URL, so I can't see why you are annoyed. Closing the report as "invalid". If you still think there is a bug in Python, please submit a new report, stating what you are doing, what happens, and what you expect to happen instead. |
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:10 | admin | set | github: 41759 |
| 2005-03-25 09:58:27 | jae | create |