should fail (original ) (raw )Created on 2006-01-08 21:45 by nnorwitz , last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin . This issue is now closed .
Files
File name
Uploaded
Description
Edit
should-fail.patch nnorwitz,2006-01-08 21:45
v1
Messages (6)
msg49277 - (view) Author: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) *
Date: 2006-01-08 21:45
As discussed here: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-January/059503.html
msg49278 - (view) Author: Collin Winter (collinwinter) *
Date: 2007-03-09 03:36
Why wasn't this ever committed?
msg55268 - (view) Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) *
Date: 2007-08-24 19:05
Shouldn't the decorator name be lowercase?
msg83566 - (view) Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) *
Date: 2009-03-14 01:46
Benjamin, is it on your plate? (or perhaps you already have a working patch somewhere? :-))
msg89354 - (view) Author: Michael Foord (michael.foord) *
Date: 2009-06-14 16:49
Patch needs updating but still seems like a useful feature. I'll update and commit. I agree that decorator should be lowercase - should_fail or shouldfail ?
msg89359 - (view) Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *
Date: 2009-06-14 17:10
Actually, unittest already has @expectedFailure.
History
Date
User
Action
Args
2022-04-11 14:56:14
admin
set
github: 42774
2009-06-14 17:10:11
benjamin.peterson
set
status: open -> closedresolution: out of datemessages: +
2009-06-14 16:49:42
michael.foord
set
messages: +
2009-05-15 02:38:33
ajaksu2
set
stage: test needed -> patch review
2009-05-15 02:38:04
ajaksu2
set
nosy: + michael.foord versions: + Python 3.2, - Python 3.1
2009-03-14 01:46:08
pitrou
set
versions: + Python 3.1, Python 2.7, - Python 2.5nosy: + pitrou , benjamin.peterson messages: + type: enhancementstage: test needed
2007-08-24 19:05:50
georg.brandl
set
nosy: + georg.brandl messages: +
2006-01-08 21:45:16
nnorwitz
create
