msg28456 - (view) |
Author: Miki Tebeka (tebeka) * |
Date: 2006-05-09 10:14 |
We're evaluating KlocWork (http://www.klocwork.com), I've ran it on the source of Python 2.4.3 and the output is attached (1562 warnings). |
|
|
msg28457 - (view) |
Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) *  |
Date: 2006-05-10 04:45 |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Thanks for these results. Unfortunately, they seem to contain many false positives, so it is unclear how one should proceed with them. |
|
|
msg28458 - (view) |
Author: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) *  |
Date: 2006-05-31 14:26 |
Logged In: YES user_id=11375 The Coverity scans also probably report some of the same bugs, so many of these problems may be fixed in the 2.5 trunk. If you're still evaluating, you could try running the tool on the 2.5 trunk (snapshot available from http://svn.python.org/snapshots/) and see if the results are shorter. |
|
|
msg28459 - (view) |
Author: Miki Tebeka (tebeka) * |
Date: 2006-06-04 09:53 |
Logged In: YES user_id=358087 I'll try to see if I can sneak it in, can't promise anything though |
|
|
msg28460 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) *  |
Date: 2006-09-30 11:34 |
Logged In: YES user_id=849994 Have all KlocWork issues been fixed now, Neal? |
|
|
msg28461 - (view) |
Author: Miki Tebeka (tebeka) * |
Date: 2006-10-03 08:24 |
Logged In: YES user_id=358087 I don't know, currently KlocWork is way down in my "todo" list :( Looks like I won't be able to continue in this matter any longer, if anyone else want to give a hand ... Miki |
|
|
msg28462 - (view) |
Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) *  |
Date: 2006-10-03 12:02 |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Ok, let's close this report, then. We continue to monitor Klocwork, regardless. |
|
|
msg28463 - (view) |
Author: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) *  |
Date: 2006-10-04 05:02 |
Logged In: YES user_id=33168 Right, all the important changes have been fixed AFAIK. There might be a few that slipped through, but we are in good enough shape. |
|
|