Issue 1504046: Rough documentation for xml.etree.ElementTree (original) (raw)

Issue1504046

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

This issue has been migrated to GitHub: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/43484

classification

process

Created on 2006-06-10 16:30 by effbot, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (4)
msg50452 - (view)	Author: Fredrik Lundh (effbot) *	Date: 2006-06-10 16:30
Here's a text version (based on the existing PythonDoc documentation). Feel free to grab it and convert it to Latex.
msg50453 - (view)	Author: Fred Drake (fdrake)	Date: 2006-06-10 19:30
Logged In: YES user_id=3066 There's an open question on whether this should be documented as xml.etree or xmlcore.etree. With the introduction of the xmlcore package in Python 2.5, should we document xml.etree or xmlcore.etree? If someone installs PyXML with Python 2.5, I don't think they're going to get xml.etree, which will be really confusing. We can be sure that xmlcore.etree will be there. I'd rather not propogate the pain caused "xml" package insanity any further. Posted also to python-dev: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/065816.html
msg50454 - (view)	Author: engelbert gruber (grubert) *	Date: 2006-06-30 11:36
Logged In: YES user_id=147070 http://members.chello.at/engelbert.gruber/python/elementtree -docpy.tar.gz contains the modified (for docpy-writer) documentation and a translation into latex.
msg50455 - (view)	Author: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) *	Date: 2006-07-10 02:37
Logged In: YES user_id=33168 I left it as it is which I think is xml.etree. I don't know which is correct, but at least we have something in svn that is better than nothing. Feel free to change it to whatever you want. Thanks Engelbert. Committed revision 50506.