Issue 1511381: codec_getstreamcodec passes extra None (original) (raw)
Issue1511381
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
This issue has been migrated to GitHub: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/43541
classification
Title: | codec_getstreamcodec passes extra None | ||
---|---|---|---|
Type: | Stage: | ||
Components: | Unicode | Versions: | Python 2.5 |
process
Status: | closed | Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|---|---|
Dependencies: | Superseder: | ||
Assigned To: | hyeshik.chang | Nosy List: | doerwalter, hyeshik.chang |
Priority: | high | Keywords: |
Created on 2006-06-23 15:00 by hyeshik.chang, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
Files | |||
---|---|---|---|
File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit |
getstreamcodec.diff | hyeshik.chang,2006-06-23 15:00 | patch to codec_getstreamcodec |
Messages (4) | ||
---|---|---|
msg28873 - (view) | Author: Hyeshik Chang (hyeshik.chang) * ![]() |
Date: 2006-06-23 15:00 |
codec_getstreamcodec passes a None object (null pointer, originally) as a "error" argument when errors is given as a null pointer. Due to this behavior, parsers can't utilize cjkcodecs which doesn't allow None as a default argument: SyntaxError: encoding problem: with BOM Attached patch fixes it to omit the argument, "errors", and changed it to use PyObject_CallFunction instead of PyEval_CallFunction because PyEval_CallFunction doesn't work for simple "O" argument. (I don't know it was intended. But we can still use PyEval_CallFunction if we write it as "(O)") I wonder if there's a reason that you chose PyEval_CallFunction for the initialization order or something? How to reproduce the error: echo "# coding: cp949" > test.py ./python test.py | ||
msg28874 - (view) | Author: Walter Dörwald (doerwalter) * ![]() |
Date: 2006-06-23 15:47 |
Logged In: YES user_id=89016 The patch looks good to me. Switching from PyEval_CallFunction() to PyObject_CallFunction() should be OK. (There seems to be subtle differences between the two, but finding out what it is looks like a scavenger hunt to me :-/)). So go ahead and check it in. | ||
msg28875 - (view) | Author: Hyeshik Chang (hyeshik.chang) * ![]() |
Date: 2006-06-23 21:18 |
Logged In: YES user_id=55188 Committed as r47086. Thanks for the review! :) | ||
msg28876 - (view) | Author: Walter Dörwald (doerwalter) * ![]() |
Date: 2006-06-26 09:29 |
Logged In: YES user_id=89016 Closing the patch |
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2022-04-11 14:56:18 | admin | set | github: 43541 |
2006-06-23 15:00:23 | hyeshik.chang | create |