Issue 1559142: some section links (previous, up, next) missing last word (original) (raw)

Issue1559142

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification

Title:	some section links (previous, up, next) missing last word
Type:	Stage:
Components:	Documentation	Versions:

process

Status:	closed	Resolution:	out of date
Dependencies:		Superseder:
Assigned To:	fdrake	Nosy List:	fdrake, georg.brandl, thimsmith
Priority:	normal	Keywords:

Created on 2006-09-15 08:17 by thimsmith, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (4)
msg29835 - (view)	Author: Tim Smith (thimsmith)	Date: 2006-09-15 08:17
The Previous, Up and Next links in the Library Reference are often missing the last word. Examples: http://www.python.org/doc/current/lib/module-operator.html """Previous: 3.9 UserString Up: 3. Python Runtime Services Next: 3.10.1 Mapping Operators to """ (Next link missing last word "Functions".) http://www.python.org/doc/current/lib/weakref-example.html """Previous: 3.3.1 Weak Reference Objects Up: 3.3 weakref Next: 3.3.3 Weak References in """ (Next link missing last two words "Extension Types".) There are many examples of this.
msg29836 - (view)	Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) *	Date: 2006-09-30 12:10
Logged In: YES user_id=849994 This seems to be a "feature" of LaTeX2html. It limits the links to three words.
msg29837 - (view)	Author: Fred Drake (fdrake)	Date: 2006-12-22 13:56
This is indeed a LaTeX2HTML (mis-)feature. I think this is the first time it's been reported as a problem, but I agree that it's misleading without some indication that something was elided (an ellipsis would help a lot).
msg29838 - (view)	Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) *	Date: 2007-08-15 18:53
Doesn't apply to Sphinx, closing.