Issue 696206: Move modules out of Carbon (original) (raw)
Issue696206
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
This issue has been migrated to GitHub: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/38081
classification
Title: | Move modules out of Carbon | |
---|---|---|
Type: | Stage: | |
Components: | Library (Lib) | Versions: |
process
Status: | closed | Resolution: | not a bug |
---|---|---|---|
Dependencies: | Superseder: | ||
Assigned To: | brett.cannon | Nosy List: | brett.cannon, collinwinter, jackjansen |
Priority: | normal | Keywords: |
Created on 2003-03-02 21:26 by jackjansen, last changed 2022-04-10 16:07 by admin. This issue is now closed.
Messages (4) | ||
---|---|---|
msg14906 - (view) | Author: Jack Jansen (jackjansen) * ![]() |
Date: 2003-03-02 21:26 |
Some modules that are in the Carbon package for historical reasons need to move to other places (with a compaitbility module in Carbon, for 2.3). Definitely CG, CF and Qt, and for Qd and AE there's a point to be made too (but there are some technical difficulties there). | ||
msg14907 - (view) | Author: Collin Winter (collinwinter) * ![]() |
Date: 2007-03-21 17:38 |
I don't understand how having these modules in Carbon is a bug. Why should they be moved out? Assigning to Brett since this seems like something that would fall under his PEP 3108. | ||
msg14908 - (view) | Author: Jack Jansen (jackjansen) * ![]() |
Date: 2007-03-21 21:02 |
I would just close this bug. The original reason for the report is that the mentioned modules are not technically part of what Apple calls "Carbon", so it was more of a naming thing than anything else. | ||
msg14909 - (view) | Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) * ![]() |
Date: 2007-03-21 21:53 |
Closed it is! |
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2022-04-10 16:07:16 | admin | set | github: 38081 |
2003-03-02 21:26:22 | jackjansen | create |