Issue 763007: dl module not installed with 2.2.3 (original) (raw)

This issue has been migrated to GitHub: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/38740

classification

Title: dl module not installed with 2.2.3
Type: Stage:
Components: Build Versions: Python 2.2

process

Status: closed Resolution: out of date
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: Nosy List: georg.brandl, nnorwitz, salmo
Priority: normal Keywords:

Created on 2003-06-30 05:08 by salmo, last changed 2022-04-10 16:09 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (5)
msg16670 - (view) Author: Mike Messmore (salmo) Date: 2003-06-30 05:08
I'm running Redhat 7.3 on an older PII. I was attemping to try out the python bindings for gstreamer when I discovered my build of python 2.2.3 was lacking the 'dl' module. I've installed RPMS built from the SRPMS available on the python.org site (with the non-redhat9 spec file). Looking around I have not found a reason for this, nor a way to go about fixing it, so I assume it is a bug. Whenever I try to run a gst-python example I get an ImportError stating the the dl module does not exist, as well as when I try to run test_dl.py in my /usr/lib/python2.2/test/ directory.
msg16671 - (view) Author: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) * (Python committer) Date: 2003-06-30 15:22
Logged In: YES user_id=33168 What is the error when building dlmodule.c?
msg16672 - (view) Author: Mike Messmore (salmo) Date: 2003-07-01 05:31
Logged In: YES user_id=121084 From the output it seems to never try to compile dlmodule.c. I ran 'rpm --rebuild python2-2.2.3-1.src.rpm 2&>1 >python_build.txt' and grepped the resulting text for dlmodule.c and only found it placing the file in the build directory. It found dlfcn.h fine. If you need me to I can attach the python_build.txt file here, but I can't find any visable errors in the building process. By the way, feel free to let me know at any point if I'm doing something retarded.
msg16673 - (view) Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * (Python committer) Date: 2005-05-31 11:36
Logged In: YES user_id=1188172 Is this still an issue? The group is Python 2.2.3, so should it be considered out of date?
msg16674 - (view) Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * (Python committer) Date: 2005-08-31 22:05
Logged In: YES user_id=1188172 Considered as out of date.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-10 16:09:32 admin set github: 38740
2003-06-30 05:08:01 salmo create