| msg17853 - (view) |
Author: Χρήστος Γεωργίου (Christos Georgiou) (tzot) * |
Date: 2003-08-20 15:16 |
| This happens in IDLE on Windows 2000, from 2.3 EXE installer. Type the following: >>> def f((a,b), c): print a, b, c >>> f( The tooltip shows up containing the following exact string (but the triple quotes): """(.0, c)""" |
|
|
| msg17854 - (view) |
Author: Χρήστος Γεωργίου (Christos Georgiou) (tzot) * |
Date: 2003-08-20 15:44 |
| Logged In: YES user_id=539787 Quite fast, Neal! :) It seems it's not exactly an IDLE bug; check ToolTip.py, line 134 (vanilla 2.3); it's the f.func_code.co_varnames that returns this tuple: ('.0', 'c', 'a', 'b') |
|
|
| msg17855 - (view) |
Author: Χρήστος Γεωργίου (Christos Georgiou) (tzot) * |
Date: 2003-08-20 16:02 |
| Logged In: YES user_id=539787 I tried this: def f((a,b), c, (d,e)): pass and f.func_code.co_varnames is ('.0', 'c', '.4', 'a', 'b', 'd', 'e') That means .0 and .4 are dummy placeholders for the argument tuples. I couldn't find a direct way to know the length of each tuple, though --unless one analyzes the first UNPACK_SEQUENCE bytecodes of fob.func_code.co_code, and then uses the tuple fob.func_code.co_varnames [fob.func_code.co_argcount:] to recreate the tuples; should we get into this trouble, or just do a regular expression replace a la: argText = "(%s)" % re.sub("\.\d+", "", argText) at line 144? |
|
|
| msg17856 - (view) |
Author: Kurt B. Kaiser (kbk) *  |
Date: 2006-07-22 21:56 |
| Logged In: YES user_id=149084 Problem still exists in 2.5 as of Rev 50739. |
|
|
| msg17857 - (view) |
Author: Kurt B. Kaiser (kbk) * |
Date: 2007-02-05 23:03 |
| Used your idea of displaying "' Rev 53641 |
|
|
| msg193597 - (view) |
Author: ariel brunner (ariel_bruner) |
Date: 2013-07-23 12:38 |
| It seems like the solution has caused a different issue: now, when defining a function with factional default arguments, the text replaces the correct values in the tooltip. Here's an example - >>> def f(a=0.5): pass >>> f( tooltip shows - "(a=0)", i.e. replaces the ".5" with . |
|
|
| msg193617 - (view) |
Author: Ned Deily (ned.deily) * |
Date: 2013-07-23 20:09 |
| Ariel, if you think there is a problem, please open a new issue with all the pertinent information. This issue was closed long ago. |
|
|
| msg193629 - (view) |
Author: ariel brunner (ariel_bruner) |
Date: 2013-07-24 08:40 |
| I will, sorry. I thought it's possible reopen an issue. Since all the relevant information is already contained here, and since the problem is with the fix to the issue, I figured it's best to reopen this one. |
|
|
| msg193744 - (view) |
Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * |
Date: 2013-07-26 20:47 |
| If someone pushes a patch and closes the issue and the buildbots break, reopening the issue is the appropriate response. Too much later and the pool of potentially interested people will have changed. Anyway, the new issue is #18539. |
|
|