GEELONG V. MELBOURNE. - ANOTHER WIN FOR GEELONG. - Geelong Advertiser (Vic. : 1859 - 1929) - 24 Jul 1899 (original) (raw)
Loading article contents, please wait...
Mon 24 Jul 1899 - Geelong Advertiser (Vic. : 1859 - 1929)
Page 2 - GEELONG V. MELBOURNE.
Toanis representing the above met t". >r the
second time this season on Saturday after
noon, and bs the match ended in a victorv
for Geelong, they are now both level in the
running for the League premiership, Fitzrov
leading them by or.e game. The position
has thus become additionally interesting, and
the League engagements for Saturday next
tend to make it more so. The defeat of
Essendon by Geelong and of Fitzrov by
Melbourne would place three teams "on a
level at the head of the list, and it is thoonly
combination of circumstances that wilt im
prove the position of Geelong so far
as :;c~t week's matches are concerned.
Gloriously fine weather fuvored the
match played on the Geelong oval
on Saturday afternoon, and the attcndanco
was the largest that has been stim this sea
| son. Melbourne proved victorious on their
owe ground when these clubs met in the
first round of this season's matches. Never
theless, tho return meeting was looked to
with interest, as the exhibition of football
clubs under notice are invariably of an at
tractive description. It turned out to be a
first-class match, and Geelong did not have
anything like tho advantage that the tcorcs
might seem to indicate to those who were
not there to witness it. Geelong took the
field minus the services of George Lockwood.
His place was filled by Henry Parkin, a
younger brother of the Geelong follower.
Considering that he was p'ayins with men to
whom he was a complete stranger, his
game was a very creditable one, and he im
proved as the match went on. Melbourne
played without their wing men, Lowden and
Monarty, but with substitutes like Scholl and
Mitchell the personnel of the visiting team
could not be said to have suffered by their
absence. The visitors got moving very
quickly in the first quarter, and played with
greater dash than their opponents during
this period of the game. Geelong, too,
teemed to /have no luok in handling the
ball, and a tendency to crowd for it confused
tbem still further, the ball when it was hit
out of the ruck usually binding in the hands
of a Melbourne man. As a result the Gee
long back lines were hard pushed duiinsj
the greater part of the quarter, and
this brought some of the finest defence play
on the part of Conway and Burns that has
been witnessed for many a day. The former
was os safe as a bouse whenever the ball
came into his neighborhood, and that seemed
to be nil along tho half-back line. When it
got past that iilio Burns was equally sure
1 back. Tho veteran, who played with an
accuracy that was a treat to witness, marked
.several times in goal, or alougside the poits,
and closed a splendid afternoon's work by
marking between the posts in the last
quarter, and running with tlie ball
half way down the ground. The general cha
rater of the game improved very materially
in the second quarter. Melbourne bad, per
hap?, the greater number of opportunities for
scoring, but Geelong worked with more Judg
ment and worked with prood result, for posi
tion. Teddy" Lockwuod dirtmiruished
himself in thi3 connection, for though he did
not score himself, he worked the ball into
places where it was handled by Geoloug to
the best advantage. The visitors could not
sustain the pace with winch they had led oil,
whereas Geelong became appreciably strong,
aud their opportunities were increased by the
tendency of Melbourne to fall into the error
i that they themselves had made in the earlier
stage of the game of crowding upon the bull.
Taking it all through, however, the game
was a very interesting one, aud the pace
from start to fiuish was a fast one. It was
played in the friendly spirit characteristic of
meetings between "these clubs, and though
Geelong won by 14 points there was nut
much between them at tho fiuish. The
umpiring: of Kecnau was extremely satisfac
tory-. Reference has already been made to
the Stirling "work of Conway and Bums, who
effectively stemmed the rushes of the oppes
ing team in the first quarter when tho
Geelong players were getting their wits
together. Pincott, amongst the back men,
deserves to come next iu order cf merit. Of
the wing men Palmer played best ou
the centre - line, and Greeves did ex
: ccedingly well considering that he had his
I eye closed aud his teeth loosened by i»u
accidental bump. Tho same remark can be
applied to Dear. Though not quite up to
his brilliant Fitzrov form Thompson did some
fine work with M'OaUum half-forward, and
James marked in grand style on the forward
lino during the first half. Spc-cial praise is
due to Teddy Lockwood for his well-judged
and unselfish play. Joe M'Shane was the
object of Melbourne tactics during the first
quarter, but these were outwitted by
the fact that he ceased to go for
the ball, leaving. it to his brother Jim.
"WardiD, who played a roving game, was the
best man on the Melbourne side. Herring
did the best place work at half-back, and
Moody, who did a lot of damage to Geelong
in the first half, played a hard gnuic
throughout. In the centre a fiue game was
played by Iiewis, and excellent service was
done for them on the wings by Seholl and
Mitchell. Herring, half-back, was the best
placed man, and Woods did a lot for tho
defence, but Moysey was not seen to his
usual advantage forward, Leith and Ryan
being most conspicuous in that division.
The state of tho game at the termination
of each period was as under :
First quarter.-Geelong, 1 goal, 2 behinds;
Secoud quarter.-Geelong, 3 goals 4 be
bebiaas ; Melbourne, 2 goals C behinds.
Third quarter.-Geelong, 4 goals 6 be
hinds ; Melbourne, 2 goals 10 behinds.
Final.-Geelong, o goals G behinds, 36
points ; Melbourne, 2 goals 10 "behinds, 22
Goal-kickers.-For Geelong, James (3),
Parkin, Thompson. For Melbourne, Pirrie,
Our Melbourne correspondent, under
Saturday's date, writes as follows :
Footballer® bad a delightful day, the weather
being all that could be wished. The results
Fitzroy, 12 goals 12 behind.-:, S4 points,
beat St. Kilda, 4 goals 6 behinds, 30 points.
Esseudon S goals 9 behinds, 57 points,
beat Carlton, 3 ;?oals S behinds, 32 points.
Collingvrood, o goals 9 beliinds, 39 point?,
beat South Melbourne, 5 goals G behind?, 36
North Melbourne, 12 goals 10 behinds, S2
points, beat Port Melbourne, 4 goals 12 be
Richmond, 7 goals 4 behinds, 4G point?,
beat "WiUiamstowu, 4 goals 13 behinds, 37
Footscray, G souls 6 behinds, 42 point?,
beat West Melbourne, 5 goals 10 behinds,
T?raUrau, o goals 9 behinds, 39 points,
beat Brunswick, 4 goals G behinds, 30