Portal Hypertension: Practice Essentials, Background, Anatomy (original) (raw)

Practice Essentials

The most common cause of portal hypertension is cirrhosis. Vascular resistance and blood flow are two important factors in its development. The images below depict esophageal varices, which are responsible for the main complication of portal hypertension, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

Portal Hypertension. Large esophageal varices with

Portal Hypertension. Large esophageal varices with red wale signs seen on endoscopy. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

Portal Hypertension. Uphill esophageal varices. Ba

Portal Hypertension. Uphill esophageal varices. Barium swallow demonstrates multiple serpiginous filling defects primarily involving the lower one third of the esophagus with striking prominence around the gastroesophageal junction. The patient had cirrhosis secondary to alcohol abuse.

Signs and symptoms

Signs and symptoms of liver disease include the following:

Complications of portal hypertension may present with the following symptoms:

Signs of portosystemic collateral formation include the following:

Signs of a hyperdynamic circulatory state include the following:

Other signs of portal hypertension and esophageal varices include the following:

See Presentation for more detail.

Diagnosis

Laboratory testing

Other laboratory tests may include the following:

Imaging studies

Procedures

See Workup for more detail.

Management

Treatment is directed at the cause of portal hypertension. Gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage is the most dramatic and lethal complication of portal hypertension; therefore, the focus is on the treatment of variceal hemorrhage. Management of patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites but without hemorrhage includes a low-sodium diet and diuretics.

Emergent treatment

Primary prophylaxis

Secondary prophylaxis

Surgery has no role in primary prophylaxis. Consider procedures, such as the following, for the prevention of rebleeding when pharmacologic and/or endoscopic therapy have failed:

See Treatment and Medication for more detail.

eMedicine Logo

Background

Many conditions are associated with portal hypertension, with cirrhosis being the most common cause of this disorder.

Two important factors, vascular resistance and blood flow, play a role in the development of portal hypertension. Ohm law is V = IR, where V is voltage, I is current, and R is resistance. This can be applied to vascular flow; ie, P = FR, where P is the pressure gradient through the portal venous system, F is the volume of blood flowing through the system, and R is the resistance to flow. Changes in either F or R affect the pressure, although in most types of portal hypertension, both of these are altered. (See Anatomy and Etiology and Pathophysiology.)

Normal portal pressure is generally considered to be between 5 and 10 mm Hg. Once the portal pressure rises to 12 mm Hg or greater, complications can arise, such as varices and ascites. Indeed, esophageal varices are responsible for the main complication of portal hypertension, upper GI hemorrhage (see Etiology and Pathophysiology, Prognosis, Presentation, and Workup). (See the images below.)

Portal Hypertension. Uphill esophageal varices. Ba

Portal Hypertension. Uphill esophageal varices. Barium swallow demonstrates multiple serpiginous filling defects primarily involving the lower one third of the esophagus with striking prominence around the gastroesophageal junction. The patient had cirrhosis secondary to alcohol abuse.

Portal Hypertension. Barium swallow demonstrating

Portal Hypertension. Barium swallow demonstrating esophageal varices involving the entire length of the esophagus. This appearance may be seen in advanced uphill varices or downhill varices secondary to superior vena cava obstruction at or below the level of the azygous vein.

Pathogenesis

The portal vein carries approximately 1500 mL/min of blood from the small and large bowel, the spleen, and the stomach to the liver. [2] Obstruction of portal venous flow, whatever the etiology, results in a rise in portal venous pressure. (See Etiology and Pathophysiology.)

The response to increased venous pressure is the development of collateral circulation that diverts the obstructed blood flow to the systemic veins. These portosystemic collaterals form by the opening and dilatation of preexisting vascular channels connecting the portal venous system and the superior and inferior vena cava. [3, 4, 5] (See the image below.)

Portal Hypertension. Computed tomography scan show

Portal Hypertension. Computed tomography scan showing esophageal varices. Note the extensive collateralization within the abdomen adjacent to the spleen as a result of severe portal hypertension.

Although high portal pressure is the main cause of the development of portosystemic collaterals, other factors, such as active angiogenesis, may also be involved. The most important portosystemic anastomoses are the gastroesophageal collaterals, which include esophageal varices. The gastroesophageal collaterals drain into the azygos vein.

eMedicine Logo

Anatomy

The portal vein drains blood from the small and large intestines, stomach, spleen, pancreas, and gallbladder. The superior mesenteric vein and the splenic vein unite behind the neck of the pancreas to form the portal vein. The portal trunk divides into two lobar veins. The right branch drains the cystic vein, and the left branch receives the umbilical and paraumbilical veins that enlarge to form umbilical varices in portal hypertension. The left gastric vein (formerly, gastric coronary vein), which runs along the lesser curvature of the stomach, receives the distal esophageal veins, which also enlarge in portal hypertension. (See the image below.)

Portal Hypertension. Portal vein and associated an

Portal Hypertension. Portal vein and associated anatomy.

eMedicine Logo

Etiology and Pathophysiology

Increase in vascular resistance

The initial factor in the etiology of portal hypertension is an increase in the vascular resistance to the portal blood flow. The law of Poiseuille, which can be applied to portal vascular resistance, R, states that R = 8hL/pr4, where h is the viscosity of blood, L is the length of the blood vessel, and r is the radius of the blood vessel. The viscosity of the blood is related to the hematocrit. The lengths of the blood vessels in the portal vasculature are relatively constant.

Thus, changes in portal vascular resistance are determined primarily by blood vessel radius. Because portal vascular resistance is indirectly proportional to the fourth power of the vessel radius, small decreases in the vessel radius cause large increases in portal vascular resistance and, therefore, in portal blood pressure (P = F8hL/pr4, where P is portal pressure and F is portal blood flow).

Liver disease that decreases the portal vascular radius produces a dramatic increase in the portal vascular resistance. In cirrhosis, the increase occurs at the hepatic microcirculation (sinusoidal portal hypertension). Increased hepatic vascular resistance in cirrhosis is not only a mechanical consequence of the hepatic architectural disorder; a dynamic component also exists due to the active contraction of myofibroblasts, activated stellate cells, and vascular smooth-muscle cells of the intrahepatic veins.

Endogenous factors and pharmacologic agents that modify the dynamic component include those that increase or decrease hepatic vascular resistance. Factors that increase hepatic vascular resistance include endothelin-1 (ET-1), alpha-adrenergic stimulus, and angiotensin II. Factors that decrease hepatic vascular resistance include nitric oxide (NO), [6] prostacyclin, and vasodilating drugs (eg, organic nitrates, adrenolytics, calcium channel blockers). [4, 7]

Endothelin and nitric oxide

Studies have demonstrated the role of ET-1 and NO in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension and esophageal varices. [4, 7] ET-1 is a powerful vasoconstrictor synthesized by sinusoidal endothelial cells that has been implicated in the increased hepatic vascular resistance of cirrhosis and in the development of liver fibrosis.

NO is a vasodilator substance that is also synthesized by the sinusoidal endothelial cells. In the cirrhotic liver, the production of NO is decreased, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity and nitrite production by sinusoidal endothelial cells are reduced. As a result, intrahepatic vasoconstriction occurs in the cirrhotic liver and accounts for approximately 20-30% of the increased intrahepatic resistance. [7, 8, 9] Another major contribution to the increased portal venous pressure is the concomitant splanchnic arteriolar vasodilation causing increased portal venous inflow.

Location of resistance in relation to the liver and sinusoids

Obstruction and increased resistance can occur at three levels in relation to the hepatic sinusoids, as follows (see Table 1, below):

Table 1. Interpretation of Surrogate Portal Venous Pressure Measurements in the Differential Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension (Open Table in a new window)

Etiology of Portal Hypertension WHVP FHVP HVPG
Prehepatic Normal Normal Normal
Intrahepatic Presinusoidal Normal Normal Normal
Sinusoidal Increased Increased Increased
Postsinusoidal Increased Normal Increased
Posthepatic Budd-Chiari syndrome N/A Hepatic vein cannot be cannulated N/A
Other posthepatic causes Increased Increased Normal
FHVP = free hepatic venous pressure; HVPG = hepatic venous pressure gradient; N/A = not applicable; WHVP = wedged hepatic venous pressure.

With regard to the liver itself, causes of portal hypertension usually are classified as prehepatic, intrahepatic, and posthepatic.

Prehepatic resistance

Prehepatic causes of increased resistance to flow include the following:

Intrahepatic resistance

Studies of hepatic microcirculation have identified several mechanisms that may explain increased intrahepatic vascular resistance to flow. These mechanisms may be summarized as follows [6] :

More specifically, intrahepatic, predominantly presinusoidal causes of resistance to flow include the following:

Intrahepatic, predominantly sinusoidal causes of resistance include the following:

With regard to chronic active hepatitis, noncirrhotic portal fibrosis is observed with various toxic injuries, and one of these includes vitamin A toxicity. This probably is due to vascular injury. Excessive doses of vitamin A taken for months or years can lead to chronic hepatic disease. Intake of doses ranging from as small as 3-fold the recommended daily dose continued for several years to doses as high as 20-fold the approved dose for a few months can lead to hepatic disease. The pericellular fibrosis characteristic of vitamin A toxicity may lead to portal hypertension.

Postsinusoidal obstruction syndrome and veno-occlusive disease of the liver are postsinusoidal causes of resistance.

Posthepatic resistance

Posthepatic causes of resistance to flow include the following:

Increase in portal blood flow

The second factor that contributes to the pathogenesis of portal hypertension is an increase in blood flow in the portal veins. This increase is established through splanchnic arteriolar vasodilatation caused by an excessive release of endogenous vasodilators (eg, endothelial, neural, humoral).

The increase in portal blood flow aggravates the increase in portal pressure; the increased flow contributes to the ability of portal hypertension to exist despite the formation of an extensive network of portosystemic collaterals that may divert as much as 80% of the portal blood flow.

Manifestations of splanchnic vasodilatation include increased cardiac output, arterial hypotension, and hypervolemia. This explains the rationale for treating portal hypertension with a low-sodium diet and diuretics to attenuate the hyperkinetic state.

Formation of varices

An elevated pressure difference between systemic and portal circulation (ie, HVPG) directly contributes to the development of varices. [8, 12, 13] HVPG is a surrogate marker of portal pressure gradient and is derived from WHVP corrected (subtracted) with free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP).

The hypertensive portal vein is decompressed by diverting up to 90% of the portal flow through portosystemic collaterals back to the heart, resulting in enlargement of these vessels. These vessels are commonly located at the gastroesophageal junction, where they lie subjacent to the mucosa and present as gastric and esophageal varices. Varices form when the HVPG exceeds 10 mm Hg; they usually do not bleed unless the HVPG exceeds 12 mm Hg (normal HVPG: 1-5 mm Hg). [8, 12, 13, 14]

Gastroesophageal varices have two main inflows. The first is the left gastric vein, and the second is the splenic hilum, through the short gastric veins. The gastroesophageal varices are important because of their propensity to bleed. (See the images below.)

Portal Hypertension. Normal venous flow through th

Portal Hypertension. Normal venous flow through the portal and systemic circulation. IMC = inferior mesenteric vein; IVC = inferior vena cava; SVC = superior vena cava.

Portal Hypertension. Redirection of flow through t

Portal Hypertension. Redirection of flow through the left gastric vein secondary to portal hypertension or portal venous occlusion. Uphill varices develop in the distal one third of the esophagus. IMC = inferior mesenteric vein; IVC = inferior vena cava; SVC = superior vena cava.

Mechanisms of variceal hemorrhage

Increased portal pressure contributes to increased varix size and decreased varix wall thickness, thus leading to increased variceal wall tension. Rupture occurs when the wall tension exceeds the elastic limits of the variceal wall. Varices are most superficial at the gastroesophageal junction and have the thinnest wall in that region; thus, variceal hemorrhage invariably occurs in that area. [14]

The following are risk factors for variceal hemorrhage [8, 12, 15] :

Note that bacterial infection could also trigger variceal bleeding through a number of mechanisms, including the following:

eMedicine Logo

Epidemiology

Population-based prevalence data for portal hypertension in the United States are not available, but portal hypertension is a frequent manifestation of liver cirrhosis. According to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), liver cirrhosis accounted for almost 30,000 deaths in the United States in 2007, making it the 12th leading cause of US deaths. [18]

The international incidence of portal hypertension is also not known, although it is probably similar to that of the US, with differences primarily in the causes. In Western countries, alcoholic and viral cirrhosis are the leading causes of portal hypertension and esophageal varices; 30% of patients with compensated cirrhosis and 60-70% of patients with decompensated cirrhosis have gastroesophageal varices at the time of diagnosis. [8, 12] The frequency of gastroesophageal varices directly correlates with the severity of the liver disease from 40% in Child class A to 85% in Child class C. [8, 12]

The de novo rate of development of esophageal varices in US patients with chronic liver disease is approximately 8% per year for the first 2 years and 30% by the sixth year. The risk of bleeding from esophageal varices is 30% in the first year after identification. Bleeding from esophageal varices accounts for approximately 10% of episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Hepatitis B is endemic in the Far East and Southeast Asia, particularly, as well as in South America, North Africa, Egypt, and other countries in the Middle East. Schistosomiasis is an important cause of portal hypertension in Egypt, Sudan, southern and sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, Caribbean, and South America. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is becoming a major cause of liver cirrhosis in the United States as hepatitis C is becoming a major cause of liver cirrhosis worldwide.

Sex- and age-related demographics

Liver disease demonstrates a sex predilection, with males making up more than 60% of patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. [19]

In general, alcoholic liver disease and viral hepatitis are the most common causes of esophageal varices in both sexes. However, veno-occlusive diseases and primary biliary cholangitis are more common in females; and in females with esophageal varices, alcoholic liver disease, viral hepatitis, veno-occlusive disease, and primary biliary cholangitis are usually responsible. In males with esophageal varices, alcoholic liver disease and viral hepatitis are usually the cause.

Portal vein thrombosis and secondary biliary cirrhosis are the most common causes of esophageal varices in children. Cirrhosis is the most common cause of esophageal varices in adults.

eMedicine Logo

Prognosis

Portal hypertension is a signficant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis, [20] particularly among those with advanced liver disease. [21] In a multicenter retrospective study (2017-2019) comprising data from 3836 patients (2% with mild liver disease, 3% with moderate-severe liver disease) admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), White et al found an increased risk for 90-day case fatality in those with moderate-severe chronic liver disease (CLD) (41%) following ICU admission compared to 25% for those with mild CLD and 17% for individuals without CLD. [21] They noted that moderate-severe CLD was an independent factor associated with higher 90-day case fatality, but not mild CLD.

Patients with severe and persistent upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (ie, requiring transfusions of more than 5 units of packed red blood cells) have a higher morbidity and mortality rate.

Variceal hemorrhage is the most common complication associated with portal hypertension. Almost 90% of patients with cirrhosis develop varices, and approximately 30% of varices bleed. The estimated mortality rate for the first episode of variceal hemorrhage is 30-50%.

Patients with a known diagnosis of esophageal varices have a 30% chance of variceal bleeding within the first year after the diagnosis. [12] The mortality rate of the bleeding episode depends on the severity of the underlying liver disease. [12]

Patients who have had one episode of bleeding from esophageal varices have a 60-80% chance of rebleeding within 1 year after the initial episode; approximately one third of further bleeding episodes are fatal. [8, 12, 22] The risk of death is maximal during the first few days after the bleeding episode and decreases slowly over the first 6 weeks. However, despite improvements in therapy, the mortality rate at 6 weeks is remains greater than 20%; this rate is higher when surgical intervention is needed. [8]

Associated abnormalities in the renal, pulmonary, cardiovascular, and immune systems of patients with esophageal varices contribute to 20-65% of deaths in these individuals. Complications associated with portal hypertension and GI bleeding include the following:

Other complications include those related to blood transfusion(s) and/or those related to the therapeutic procedures used in the management of bleeding varices.

In a retrospective study (2002-2014) of 80 patients with portopulmonary hypertension, Mayo Clinic investigators noted that intrapulmonary vascular dilatations (IPVDs) were common and associated with reduced survival. [23] The presence of IPVDs was detected by agitated saline contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE), traditionally more frequently associated with hepatopulmonary syndrome than with portopulmonary hypertension. [23]

Prognosis in patients with esophageal varices

Patients with a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) of 20 mm Hg measured 24 hours after the onset of bleeding esophageal varices have a higher 1-year mortality rate. [12] Other factors that can affect the prognosis of patients with esophageal varices include the following:

Several factors are known to influence the prognosis of esophageal bleeding. These include the following:

eMedicine Logo

Patient Education

Educate patients about the benefits and disadvantages of available treatment options.

Alcohol intake should strongly be discouraged, especially in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Available resources for alcohol rehabilitation should be provided, along with any prophylaxis for alcohol withdrawal symptoms, when indicated.

Unless contraindicated, all patients with esophageal varices should take beta-blockers to reduce the risk of bleeding. Patients should also be educated about the adverse effects of beta-blockers and the possible risks of their abrupt discontinuation.

Advise patients who have ascites of the risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during an episode of acute variceal bleeding.

eMedicine Logo

  1. Hou W, Sanyal AJ. Ascites: diagnosis and management. Med Clin North Am. 2009 Jul. 93(4):801-17, vii. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  2. Khurana I. Essentials of Medical Physiology. Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India: Elsevier; 2008. 215.
  3. Lubel JS, Angus PW. Modern management of portal hypertension. Intern Med J. 2005 Jan. 35(1):45-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  4. Obara K. Hemodynamic mechanism of esophageal varices. Dig Endosc. 2006 Jan. 18(1):6-9.
  5. Ravindra KV, Eng M, Marvin M. Current management of sinusoidal portal hypertension. Am Surg. 2008 Jan. 74(1):4-10. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  6. Theodorakis NG, Wang YN, Wu JM, Maluccio MA, Sitzmann JV, Skill NJ. Role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the development of portal hypertension in the carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis model. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009 Oct. 297(4):G792-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  7. Gupta TK, Toruner M, Chung MK, Groszmann RJ. Endothelial dysfunction and decreased production of nitric oxide in the intrahepatic microcirculation of cirrhotic rats. Hepatology. 1998 Oct. 28(4):926-31. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  8. [Guideline] Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey WD, and the Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Sep. 102(9):2086-102. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  9. Bhathal PS, Grossman HJ. Reduction of the increased portal vascular resistance of the isolated perfused cirrhotic rat liver by vasodilators. J Hepatol. 1985. 1(4):325-37. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  10. Chawla Y, Duseja A, Dhiman RK. Review article: the modern management of portal vein thrombosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 1. 30(9):881-94. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  11. Seijo S, Reverter E, Miquel R, et al. Role of hepatic vein catheterisation and transient elastography in the diagnosis of idiopathic portal hypertension. Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Oct. 44(10):855-60. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  12. [Guideline] Dite P, Labrecque D, Fried M, et al, for the World Gastroenterology Organisation (WGO). World Gastroenterology Organisation practice guideline: esophageal varices. Munich, Germany: World Gastroenterology Organisation; 2008. Available at https://guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=13000. Accessed: August 6, 2012.
  13. Thalheimer U, Leandro G, Samonakis DN, Triantos CK, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Assessment of the agreement between wedge hepatic vein pressure and portal vein pressure in cirrhotic patients. Dig Liver Dis. 2005 Aug. 37(8):601-8. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  14. Sanyal AJ, Bosch J, Blei A, Arroyo V. Portal hypertension and its complications. Gastroenterology. 2008 May. 134(6):1715-28. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  15. [Guideline] Qureshi W, Adler DG, Davila R, et al, for the Standards of Practice Committee. ASGE Guideline: the role of endoscopy in the management of variceal hemorrhage, updated July 2005. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Nov. 62(5):651-5. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  16. Heil T, Mattes P, Loeprecht H. Gastro-oesophageal reflux: an aetiological factor for bleeding in oesophageal varices?. Br J Surg. 1980 Jul. 67(7):467-8. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  17. Eckardt VF, Grace ND. Gastroesophageal reflux and bleeding esophageal varices. Gastroenterology. 1979 Jan. 76(1):39-42. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  18. Yoon Y, Yi H. Surveillance report no. 88: liver cirrhosis mortality in the United States, 1970-2007. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Available at https://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/surveillance88/Cirr07.htm. Accessed: Jul 17 2012.
  19. Kim WR, Brown RS Jr, Terrault NA, El-Serag H. Burden of liver disease in the United States: summary of a workshop. Hepatology. 2002 Jul. 36(1):227-42. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  20. Cannella R, Giambelluca D, Pellegrinelli A, Cabassa P. Color Doppler ultrasound in portal hypertension: a closer look at left gastric vein hemodynamics. J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Jan. 40 (1):7-14. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  21. White K, Tabah A, Ramanan M, Shekar K, Edwards F, Laupland KB. 90-Day case-fatality in critically ill patients with chronic liver disease influenced by presence of portal hypertension, results from a multicentre retrospective cohort study. J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jan. 38 (1):5-10. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  22. D'Amico G, Garcia-Pagan JC, Luca A, Bosch J. Hepatic vein pressure gradient reduction and prevention of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2006 Nov. 131(5):1611-24. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  23. Fussner LA, Iyer VN, Cartin-Ceba R, Lin G, Watt KD, Krowka MJ. Intrapulmonary vascular dilatations are common in portopulmonary hypertension and may be associated with decreased survival. Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov. 21(11):1355-64. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  24. Jutabha R, Jensen DM. Management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the patient with chronic liver disease. Med Clin North Am. 1996 Sep. 80(5):1035-68. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  25. Boonpongmanee S, Fleischer DE, Pezzullo JC, et al. The frequency of peptic ulcer as a cause of upper-GI bleeding is exaggerated. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jun. 59(7):788-94. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  26. Enestvedt BK, Gralnek IM, Mattek N, Lieberman DA, Eisen G. An evaluation of endoscopic indications and findings related to nonvariceal upper-GI hemorrhage in a large multicenter consortium. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Mar. 67(3):422-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  27. Singal AK, Ahmad M, Soloway RD. Duplex Doppler ultrasound examination of the portal venous system: an emerging novel technique for the estimation of portal vein pressure. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 May. 55(5):1230-40. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  28. [Guideline] Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Bosch J. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2017 Jan. 65(1):310-35. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  29. [Guideline] VIlla E, Bianchini M, Blasi A, et al, for the European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on prevention and management of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2022 May. 76(5):1151-84. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  30. [Guideline] Ferraioli G, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, et al. WFUMB Guideline/guidance on liver multiparametric ultrasound: Part 1. Update to 2018 guidelines on liver ultrasound elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2024 Aug. 50 (8):1071-87. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  31. Martinez-Moreno B, Martínez Martínez J, Herrera I, et al. Correlation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient measurements with hepatic venous pressure gradient: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2024 Sep 3. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  32. Mesropyan N, Isaak A, Faron A, et al. Magnetic resonance parametric mapping of the spleen for non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension. Eur Radiol. 2021 Jan. 31 (1):85-93. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  33. Wereszczynska-Siemiatkowska U, Swidnicka-Siergiejko A, Siemiatkowski A, et al. Endothelin 1 and transforming growth factor-β1 correlate with liver function and portal pressure in cirrhotic patients. Cytokine. 2015 Dec. 76(2):144-51. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  34. Beppu K, Inokuchi K, Koyanagi N, et al. Prediction of variceal hemorrhage by esophageal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1981 Nov. 27(4):213-8. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  35. Khan NM, Shapiro AB. The white nipple sign: please do not disturb. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2011 May. 5(2):386-90. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  36. de Franchis R, Abraldes JG, Bajaj J, et al, for the Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015 Sep. 63(3):743-52. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  37. Castera L, Pinzani M, Bosch J. Non invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using transient elastography. J Hepatol. 2012 Mar. 56(3):696-703. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  38. Kim TY, Jeong WK, Sohn JH, Kim J, Kim MY, Kim Y. Evaluation of portal hypertension by real-time shear wave elastography in cirrhotic patients. Liver Int. 2015 Nov. 35(11):2416-24. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  39. Ishikawa T, Sasaki R, Nishimura T, et al. Liver stiffness measured by transient elastography as predictor of prognoses following portosystemic shunt occlusion. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan. 34 (1):215-23. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  40. Salzl P, Reiberger T, Ferlitsch M, et al. Evaluation of portal hypertension and varices by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the liver compared to transient elastography and AST to platelet ratio index. Ultraschall Med. 2014 Dec. 35(6):528-33. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  41. Elkrief L, Rautou PE, Ronot M, et al. Prospective comparison of spleen and liver stiffness by using shear-wave and transient elastography for detection of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Radiology. 2015 May. 275(2):589-98. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  42. Pollo-Flores P, Soldan M, Santos UC, et al. Three months of simvastatin therapy vs. placebo for severe portal hypertension in cirrhosis: A randomized controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Nov. 47(11):957-63. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  43. de Franchis R. Evolving consensus in portal hypertension. Report of the Baveno IV consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2005 Jul. 43(1):167-76. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  44. Castaneda B, Morales J, Lionetti R, et al. Effects of blood volume restitution following a portal hypertensive-related bleeding in anesthetized cirrhotic rats. Hepatology. 2001 Apr. 33(4):821-5. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  45. Sass DA, Chopra KB. Portal hypertension and variceal hemorrhage. Med Clin North Am. 2009 Jul. 93(4):837-53, vii-viii. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  46. Rimola A, Garcia-Tsao G, Navasa M. Diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a consensus document. International Ascites Club. J Hepatol. 2000 Jan. 32(1):142-53. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  47. de Franchis R. Revising consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno V consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2010 Oct. 53(4):762-8. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  48. Chandramouli J, Jensen L. Vasopressin injection. [Updated October 16, 2012.] Alternative agents & management. Table 1. Alternatives to vasopressin in selected situations. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Available at https://www.ashp.org/DrugShortages/Current/bulletin.aspx?id=795. Accessed: November 20, 2012.
  49. Imperiale TF, Teran JC, McCullough AJ. A meta-analysis of somatostatin versus vasopressin in the management of acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage. Gastroenterology. 1995 Oct. 109(4):1289-94. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  50. Baik SK, Jeong PH, Ji SW. Acute hemodynamic effects of octreotide and terlipressin in patients with cirrhosis: a randomized comparison. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Mar. 100(3):631-5. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  51. D'Amico G, Pagliaro L, Pietrosi G, Tarantino I. Emergency sclerotherapy versus vasoactive drugs for bleeding oesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17. CD002233. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  52. Bajaj JS, Sanyal AJ. Treatment of active variceal hemorrhage. UpToDate. Available at https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-of-active-variceal-hemorrhage. Accessed: August 2, 2012.
  53. Garcia-Pagan JC, Bosch J. Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of portal hypertension. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Nov. 2(11):526-35. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  54. Avgerinos A, Armonis A, Stefanidis G, et al. Sustained rise of portal pressure after sclerotherapy, but not band ligation, in acute variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2004 Jun. 39(6):1623-30. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  55. Cheng LF, Wang ZQ, Li CZ, Lin W, Yeo AE, Jin B. Low incidence of complications from endoscopic gastric variceal obturation with butyl cyanoacrylate. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Sep. 8(9):760-6. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  56. Garcia-Pagan JC, Caca K, Bureau C, et al. Early use of TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24. 362(25):2370-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  57. Commins N, Subhaharan D, Kurup R, et al. Indications and outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt insertion in two regional Australian hepatology centres. Intern Med J. 2024 Aug. 54 (8):1302-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  58. Danziger J, Thummalakunta L, Nelson R, Faintuch S. The risk of acute kidney injury with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. J Nephrol. 2015 Dec. 28(6):725-8. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  59. Samonakis DN, Triantos CK, Thalheimer U. Management of portal hypertension. Postgrad Med J. 2004 Nov. 80(949):634-41. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  60. D'Amico G, Pagliaro L, Bosch J. Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: an evidence-based approach. Semin Liver Dis. 1999. 19(4):475-505. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  61. Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Groszmann R. Current management of portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2003. 38 Suppl 1:S54-68. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  62. Chang YW. Indication of treatment for esophageal varices: who and when?. Dig Endosc. 2006 Jan. 18(1):10-5.
  63. Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey W. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007 Sep. 46(3):922-38. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  64. Sinagra E, Perricone G, D'Amico M, Tine F, D'Amico G. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the haemodynamic effects of carvedilol compared with propranolol for portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Mar. 39(6):557-68. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  65. Chen S, Wang JJ, Wang QQ, et al. The effect of carvedilol and propranolol on portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015. 9:961-70. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  66. Li T, Ke W, Sun P, et al. Carvedilol for portal hypertension in cirrhosis: systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016 May 4. 6(5):e010902. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
  67. Kumar A, Jha SK, Sharma P, et al. Addition of propranolol and isosorbide mononitrate to endoscopic variceal ligation does not reduce variceal rebleeding incidence. Gastroenterology. 2009 Sep. 137(3):892-901, 901.e1. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  68. Merkel C, Marin R, Enzo E, et al. Randomised trial of nadolol alone or with isosorbide mononitrate for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Gruppo-Triveneto per L'ipertensione portale (GTIP). Lancet. 1996 Dec 21-28. 348(9043):1677-81. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  69. Garcia-Tsao G. Portal hypertension. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2000 May. 16(3):282-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  70. Gluud LL, Klingenberg S, Nikolova D, Gluud C. Banding ligation versus beta-blockers as primary prophylaxis in esophageal varices: systematic review of randomized trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Dec. 102(12):2842-8; quiz 2841, 2849. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  71. Lay CS, Tsai YT, Lee FY, et al. Endoscopic variceal ligation versus propranolol in prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Feb. 21(2):413-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  72. Lo GH, Lai KH, Cheng JS, et al. Endoscopic variceal ligation plus nadolol and sucralfate compared with ligation alone for the prevention of variceal rebleeding: a prospective, randomized trial. Hepatology. 2000 Sep. 32(3):461-5. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  73. Lo GH, Chen WC, Chan HH, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of banding ligation plus drug therapy versus drug therapy alone in the prevention of esophageal variceal rebleeding. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jun. 24(6):982-7. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  74. de Franchis R. Updating consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno III Consensus Workshop on definitions, methodology and therapeutic strategies in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2000 Nov. 33(5):846-52. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  75. Ferreira FG, Ribeiro MA, de Fatima Santos M, Assef JC, Szutan LA. Doppler ultrasound could predict varices progression and rebleeding after portal hypertension surgery: lessons from 146 EGDS and 10 years of follow-up. World J Surg. 2009 Oct. 33(10):2136-43. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  76. Burger-Klepp U, Karatosic R, Thum M, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography during orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with esophagoastric varices. Transplantation. 2012 Jul 27. 94(2):192-6. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  77. Bonnet S, Sauvanet A, Bruno O, et al. Long-term survival after portal vein arterialization for portal vein thrombosis in orthotopic liver transplantation. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010 Jan. 34(1):23-8. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
  78. Genovesi S, Prata Pizzala DM, Pozzi M, et al. Baroreceptor sensitivity and baroreceptor effectiveness index in cirrhosis: the relevance of hepatic venous pressure gradient. Liver Int. 2010 Feb. 30(2):232-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

Author

Jesus Carale, MD Consulting Gastroenterologist, Arkansas Valley Regional Medical Center, La Junta, Colorado

Jesus Carale, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Gastroenterological Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Samy A Azer, MD, PhD, MPH Professor of Medical Education, Chair of Medical Education Research and Development Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia; Visiting Professor of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan; Former Senior Lecturer in Medical Education, Faculty Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne and University of Sydney, Australia

Samy A Azer, MD, PhD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, Association for Psychological Science, Gastroenterological Society of Australia, New York Academy of Sciences, Royal Society of Medicine, Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Acknowledgements

Samy A Azer, MD, PhD, MPH Professor of Medical Education and Head of Curriculum Development Unit, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Visiting Professor of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan; former Professor of Medical Education, Chair of Medical Education Research and Development Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia; former Consultant to the Victorian Postgraduate Medical Foundation, Melbourne, Australia; former Senior Lecturer in Medical Education, Faculty Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne and University of Sydney, Australia

Samy A Azer, MD, PhD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, Association for Psychological Science, Gastroenterological Society of Australia, New York Academy of Sciences, Royal Society of Medicine, and Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Simmy Bank, MD Chair, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Hospital, Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Sandeep Mukherjee, MB, BCh, MPH, FRCPC Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Consulting Staff, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center

Sandeep Mukherjee, MB, BCh, MPH, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Disclosure: Merck Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Ikaria Pharmaceuticals Honoraria Board membership

Ann Ouyang, MBBS Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine; Attending Physician, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Milton S Hershey Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Waqar A Qureshi, MD Associate Professor of Medicine, Chief of Endoscopy, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Waqar A Qureshi, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Reference Salary Employment

Noel Williams, MD Professor Emeritus, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Noel Williams, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.