�� .�., �� .�., �� .�., �� .�., �� .�. �� -�� -�� // �� . - 2005. (original) (raw)

��
>
��
>
��
>
��
>
��
>
��

�� .�., �� .�., �� .�., �� .�., �� .�. �� -�� -�� // �� . - 2005. - � 2, �. 60-62.

�� -�� -�� .�. ��, �.�. ��, �.�. ��, �.�. ��, �.�. �� -�� -�� (��) � �� . �� : ��, �� ; �� , �� [1,7,8,13,14]. � �� , �� , ��, ��, �� . �� , �� , �� , �� . �� , �� , � �� , ��, �� . �� , �� . �� , �� , � �� , �� - �� , �� - �� ��. �� , �� . �� Parkman H.P. � ��. (2003) �� . �� , �� . �� , �� , �� . �� , �� . ��, �� , �� , �� . � �� [9, 10]. �� , �� . � �� 1989 �. �� -�� (��) �� . �� , �� , �� 1 �� 24 ��, � �� , �� . �� , ��, ��, �� , � �� 0,01-0,25 ��. �� , � �� . �� , �� , �� , � �� . �� , �� . �� - 40 �� , �� 2-� �� . �� 24 ��, � �� -��. �� . �� , �� , �� , �� , �� . �� 1989 �. � �� 1265 ��, � �� : �� (��), �� , �� , �� , �� , �� , �� . �� 112 �� .
�� 1. ��
�� �� (Pi/Ps) �� (K) �� (Pi/Pi+1) �� 22,4±11,2 4,85�2,1 10,4�5,7 �� 2,1�1,2 0,9�0,5 0,6�0,3 �� 3,35�1,65 3,43�1,5 0,4�0,2 �� 8,08�4,01 4,99�2,5 0,13�0,08 �� 64,04�32,01 22,85�9,8 -
�� -�� 3 �� : �� (Pi/Ps) - �� , �� , �� . �� (%). �� , �� ; �� (K) - �� , �� ; �� (Pi/Pi+1) - �� , �� . �� : �� -�� . �� , ��, �� , �� - � �� , �� . �� , �� , �� . �� . �� . �� . �� , ��, �� , � �� . � �� , �� 245 ��. �� , � �� . �� 1.

��. 1. �� , ��, ��, �� . �� .
�� 2,5 �� , �� , �� . �� 1,5 � �� , �� , �� . �� -�� . �� , ��, �� , �� 2.

��. 2. �� , ��, ��, ��
�� 2-� �� , �� . �� 2-4 �� 12-24 ��, �� , �� . �� , ��, �� , �� . �� . �� 46 �� , � 26 �� , �� . � �� , �� . �� , �� , �� , �� . �� , �� , �� -�� . �� , �� , � �� . �� , �� : ��, �� . �� 96%. �� , �� , �� , �� . �� , �� . �� "��-��" (�. ��) � �� : �� -01 � ("��") � �� -01 ("��-��"). �� -�� (��) �� 1989 �� "��", � 2002 �� - "��-��". �� 2 �� 40 ��: �� , �� 200 �� 100 � �� . �� -�� . �� "��-��" �� "��" �� 24 ��, � �� �� -��. �� �� .�., �� .�., �� .�., �� .�. � �� // ��-�� 1 �� . �. - 1975. - �. 60-63. �� .�., �� .�., �� .�. �� -�� , �� // ��. �� ., ��., ��. - 1998., - �1, - �. 80-82. �� .�. ��-�� // ��…. ��.��.��.��. �. -1994. -18 ��. �� .�., �� .�., �� .�. �� // ��. ��. -1989. - �4. - �. 48-51. �. ��. "�� " // �. "��". - 1989. �. - 303. �� .�. "�� " // �. "��". - 1986. - �. 608. �� .�., �� .�., �� .�., �� .�., �� .�. �� -�� // �� 2203612 �� 10 �� 2003 �. �� .�., �� .�., �� .�., �� .�., �� .�. �� // �� 2208380 �� 20 �� 2003 �. �� .�. �� . ��. ��. �-�� . ��, �, 1981, 38 �. Barbar M, Steffen R, Wyllie R, Goske M. Electrogastrography versus gastric emptying scintigraphy in children with symptoms suggestive of gastric motility disorders. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000 Feb;30(2):193-197. Bass P. The Relationships of Electrical activity to contractions. NY, London, 1971:59-71. Bergan J., Yao J. Acute intestinal ishemia // Vascular Surgery 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1981, 948-63 Kauer WK, Stein HJ, Balint A, Siewert JR. Transcutaneous electrogastrography: a non-invasive method to evaluate post-operative gastric disorders? Hepatogastroenterology. 1999 Mar-Apr;46(26):1244-1248. Krauz M., Many J. Acute superior mesenteric arterial occlusion - a plea for early diagnosis // Surgery, 1978, 83, 482. Parkman HP, Hasler WL, Barnett JL, Eaker EY; American Motility Society Clinical GI Motility Testing Task Force. Electrogastrography: a document prepared by the gastric section of the American Motility Society Clinical GI Motility Testing Task Force. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003 Apr;15(2):89-102. Stoney R., Olcott C. Visceral artery syndromes // Surg. Clin. Norrht. Am., 1979, 59, 637-47.

�� "��"

��  ��. ��: "�� ", "�� -��", "�� ", "�� " � ��.