HASTINGS v. U.S. | 837 F.Supp. 3 (1993) | 7fsupp31839 | Leagle.com (original) (raw)

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Steven Catz, Stephanie Y. Moore, District of Columbia School of Law, Washington, DC, for plaintiff.

D. Scott Barash, Sarah L. Wilson, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Morgan John Frankel, Michael Davidson, Office of Senate Legal Counsel, Washington, DC, for defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

This case is before this Court on remand from the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Nixon v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 732, 122 L.Ed.2d 1 (1993). 988 F.2d 1280 (D.C.Cir.1993). Plaintiff in this case, Alcee Hastings, an impeached federal district court judge, claims that the United States Senate used improper...

Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

• Updated daily.
• Uncompromising quality.
• Complete, Accurate, Current.