IN RE MARRIAGE OF JENSEN | 7 Cal.Rptr... | tr3d7011642 | Leagle.com (original) (raw)
7 Cal.Rptr.3d 701 (2003)
114 Cal.App.4th 587
In re the MARRIAGE of Julie and Peter JENSEN. Ubolratana Mahidol, Appellant, v. Peter L. Jensen, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 18, 2003.
Review Denied April 14, 2004.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Law Offices of Allen I. Neiman, Los Angeles, Allen I. Neiman and Amy L. Neiman, for Appellant.
Law Offices of Stephen Temko, Stephen Temko; Cannon Parks & Oberhansley, Robert J. Parks and Marjeta D. Six, San Diego, for Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.
McCONNELL, P.J.
We hold in this case that in a proceeding under the Family Code the superior court lacked in personam jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction to enforce provisions of the parties' marital settlement agreement (MSA) requiring an adult disabled child living in Thailand to visit his father in California. We further hold the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to enforce provisions of the MSA requiring...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.