Adherence of Human Vaginal Lactobacilli to Vaginal Epithelial Cells and Interaction with Uropathogens (original) (raw)

Infect Immun. 1998 May; 66(5): 1985–1989.

Soledad Boris

Area de Microbiología, Departamento de Biología Funcional, Instituto Universitario de Biotecnología de Asturias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo,1 and Hospital Monte Naranco, Vázquez de Mella 107, 33012 Oviedo,2 Spain

Juan E. Suárez

Fernando Vázquez

Covadonga Barbés

*Corresponding author. Mailing address: Area de Microbiología, Departamento de Biología Funcional, Instituto Universitario de Biotecnología de Asturias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain. Phone: 34-8-5104217. Fax: 34-8-5103148. E-mail: se.noinu.acimiuq.noruas@sebrabc.

Editor: P. E. Orndorff

Received 1997 Oct 14; Revisions requested 1997 Dec 10; Accepted 1998 Feb 8.

Abstract

Three strains of Lactobacillus, identified as Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus gasseri, and Lactobacillus jensenii, were selected from among 70 isolates from the vaginas of healthy premenopausal women for properties relevant to mucosal colonization or antagonism. All three self-aggregated and adhered to epithelial vaginal cells, displacing well-known vaginal pathogens, such as G. vaginalis, and inhibiting the growth in vitro of Escherichia coli and Streptococcus agalactiae. The surface components involved in self-aggregation appeared to be proteins for L. gasseri and lipoproteins for L. acidophilus and L. jensenii, as judged by susceptibility to treatment with appropriate degrading enzymes. The factors responsible for adherence to epithelial vaginal cells seemed to be glycoproteins (L. acidophilus and L. gasseri) and carbohydrate (L. jensenii). The receptors of the vaginal cells were glycolipids, which presumably were the targets of the competition observed between the lactobacilli and the pathogenic microbes.

The vaginal ecosystem harbors a microbiota that is being increasingly recognized as protecting it from invading pathogens, including those that cause urinary tract infections and sexually transmitted diseases. Lactobacilli are dominant in this habitat, at 107 to 108 CFU/g of vaginal fluid in healthy premenopausal women (18). Among them, those belonging to the Lactobacillus acidophilus group and L. fermentum are most frequently isolated, although others, such as L. plantarum, L. brevis, L. jensenii, L. casei, L. delbrueckii, and L. salivarius, are isolated as well (14).

Lactobacilli are believed to interfere with pathogens by different mechanisms. The first is competitive exclusion of genitourinary pathogens from receptors present on the surface of the genitourinary epithelium (5, 21). Second, lactobacilli coaggregate with some uropathogenic bacteria (14), a process that, when linked to the production of antimicrobial compounds, such as lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide, bacteriocin-like substances (12, 15), and possibly biosurfactants (21), would result in inhibition of the growth of the pathogen.

Adherence of bacteria to epithelial cells has been shown to be an important factor in the colonization of mucous membranes. However, little is known about the mechanisms by which lactobacilli from the vaginas of healthy young women adhere to vaginal epithelial cells, although the variety of surface structures in these bacteria implies that a spectrum of adherence mechanisms may exist. Furthermore, self-aggregation may substantially increase the colonization potential of lactobacilli in environments with short residence times.

In this study, we report on the mechanisms of self-aggregation and adherence to epithelial vaginal cells of three vaginal Lactobacillus isolates. Furthermore, we analyzed how these properties may interfere with pathogenic colonization, both through cell surface receptor competition and growth inhibition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and culture conditions.

Lactobacilli were incubated on LAPTg agar or broth (13) at 37°C. Initial isolations from vaginal samples were done under a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The isolates were subsequently incubated by aerobiosis. Gardnerella vaginalis was grown in brain heart infusion (Biokar) under a 5% CO2 atmosphere, Escherichia coli was propagated in eosin-methylene blue (Pronadisa), and Streptococcus agalactiae and Candida albicans were grown in LAPTg at 37°C by aerobiosis. All strains were ambulatory or clinical specimens obtained at the Hospital Monte Naranco.

Aggregation tests.

Determination of the self-aggregation ability of lactobacilli and biochemical treatments of the cells to determine the nature of the aggregation factor(s) were performed as described previously (3).

Electron microscopy.

Lactobacilli from overnight cultures in LAPTg broth were washed with distilled water and resuspended in the liquid that remained in the pellets, and 5-μl aliquots were allowed to stand on copper grids coated with Formvar (Merck). The excess liquid was removed, 5 μl of 2% (wt/vol) uranyl acetate solution was added, and the mixture was allowed to stand for 2 min. The negatively stained cells were examined in a JEOL 2000 EXII transmission electron microscope at 120 kV.

Hydrophobicity determination.

The surface hydrophobicity of the lactobacilli was determined by measuring the affinity of cells cultured overnight for xylene in a two-phase system (water-xylene) (17).

Adherence assays.

Vaginal epithelial cells were collected from healthy premenopausal women and treated as described previously (23). Overnight cultures of the lactobacilli to be tested were suspended to 108 cells/ml in Eagle’s minimal essential medium (Flow Laboratories). Equal volumes of the bacterial suspensions and of vaginal cells were mixed and incubated at 37°C with orbital shaking (100 rpm/min) for 30 min. Afterward, the suspensions were passed through 8-μm-pore-size Millipore filters and washed with 1 volume of Eagle’s medium. The cells retained on the filter were placed on albumin-coated microscope slides, fixed with ethanol, and Gram stained. The assays were started within 1 h of the collection of the epithelial cells, and each determination was performed in duplicate. As a negative control for adherence, L. plantarum LL 441 isolated from cheese whey was used (10).

The nature of the bacterial and eukaryotic factors involved in adherence was determined through treatment of the cells with proteinase K, lipase, and sodium metaperiodate as described before (2, 20). The sensitivity of adherence to temperature was assayed by heating lactobacillus suspensions to 100°C for 10 min in phosphate-buffered saline. The reversibility of adherence was tested by repeatedly washing the mixed lactobacilli and epithelial cells with 20 mM EDTA or EGTA.

Interference assays.

Interference experiments were performed with G. vaginalis and C. albicans, since they were the only potential genitourinary pathogens used in this work that showed a significant capacity to adhere to vaginal cells (see below). The procedures described by Spencer and Chesson (19) were used, with some modifications. For exclusion tests, lactobacilli and vaginal epithelial cells were incubated together for 30 min; afterward, C. albicans or G. vaginalis cells were added, and incubation was continued for a further 30 min. For competition tests, lactobacilli, any of the pathogens, and vaginal epithelial cells were mixed and incubated for 30 min. For displacement tests, C. albicans or G. vaginalis and vaginal epithelial cells were incubated together for 30 min, lactobacilli were added, and incubation was continued for a further 30 min. The resulting suspensions were filtered, and cell observation was performed as indicated above.

Coaggregation assays.

Coaggregation assays were designed based on previously reported methods (16). Microorganism suspensions were adjusted to an _A_600 of 0.6. Aliquots of 500 μl of the three Lactobacillus strains were mixed with 500 μl of each of the four pathogens and incubated at 37°C in an orbital shaker at 100 rpm for 4 h. The suspensions were then macroscopically scored for coaggregation according to a scale described elsewhere (16). In addition, they were observed under a phase-contrast microscope after Gram staining.

Statistical analysis.

All measurements were made with a minimum of duplicate samples per variable for each experiment. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation for representative experiments. Comparisons were analyzed by Student’s t test.

RESULTS

Selection of adherent lactobacilli.

Vaginal exudates were swabbed onto selective media for sexually transmissible pathogens and on chocolate agar. Incubation was done for 72 h at 37°C under a 5 to 10% CO2 atmosphere with daily inspections for growth. From the first series of media, the potential genitourinary pathogens indicated in the Materials and Methods section were obtained. From the chocolate agar plates, white colonies, consisting of gram-positive bacilli unable to grow under complete aerobiosis, were isolated, restreaked onto LAPTg agar, and incubated under the same conditions. In this way, 70 vaginal Lactobacillus isolates were obtained. Three of them were selected for their autoaggregating ability and adherence to vaginal epithelial cells. They were classified as L. acidophilus, L. gasseri, and L. jensenii with the API 50 CHL system (BioMerieux).

Aggregation studies.

All three strains self-aggregated, producing macroscopic granules; the effect was also observed under the light microscope (Fig. 1A). Aggregation was abolished by treatment of the cells with proteinase K and, for L. acidophilus and L. jensenii, also after incubation with lipase (Fig. 1B). This result indicates that the aggregation-promoting factor is a protein for L. gasseri and a lipoprotein for the other organisms (or separated lipids and proteins, both of which would be necessary for aggregation to occur). Since no effect was seen after phenol extraction or sodium metaperiodate treatment of the cells, lipoteichoic acids or carbohydrates are probably not involved in the aggregation of these strains (8).

Microscopic observations of autoaggregating L. acidophilus. (A) Control. (B) Cells treated with proteinase K or lipase.

Irrespective of the nature of the factors, all three strains showed extremely high surface hydrophobicity, with values in excess of 80% of the cells migrating into the xylene phase in the two-phase Rosenberg test (17); nonadherent lactobacilli were much more hydrophilic, showing values of 40% or less.

The aggregation-promoting molecules seemed to form a continuous layer around the cells, as observed by negative staining before (Fig. 2A) and after (Fig. 2B) treatment with proteinase K or lipase.

Electron micrographs of negatively stained L. acidophilus. (A) Control. (B) Cells treated with proteinase K or lipase.

Adherence to vaginal epithelial cells.

The three human Lactobacillus strains were adherent, while L. plantarum LL 441, a strain isolated from dairy products and used as a negative control, was not (Fig. 3). The adherence ability was lost upon treatment of the cells with sodium metaperiodate and, for L. acidophilus and L. gasseri, with proteinase K. However, lipase did not exert any significant effect on adherence. Finally, it seemed that cations were necessary for L. gasseri and L. jensenii adherence, while L. acidophilus adherence was heat sensitive (Table 1). These data indicate that L. acidophilus receptors are heat-sensitive glycoproteins, those of L. gasseri are cation-requiring glycoproteins, and those of L. jensenii are cation-requiring carbohydrates.

Adherence of lactobacilli to vaginal epithelial cells. (A) Gram-stained preparation of adherent L. acidophilus isolated from human vaginal cells. (B) As a negative control, L. plantarum LL 441, isolated from dairy products, is shown.

TABLE 1

Ability of Lactobacillus isolates to adhere to vaginal epithelial cells

Treatment	No. of adherent cells (mean ± SD) of:
L. acidophilus	L. gasseri	L. jensenii
None (control)	46.1 ± 13.7	38.6 ± 15.4	24.3 ± 12.5
Proteinase K (1 mg/ml)	2.6 ± 2.3a	2.3 ± 2.1b	20.5 ± 6.9c
Lipase (1 mg/ml)	45.9 ± 13.4a	33.2 ± 14.2b	24.9 ± 12.4c
Sodium metaperiodate (10 mg/ml)	1.47 ± 1.44a	2.3 ± 2.2b	4.5 ± 4.1c
Heat (100°C)	2.81 ± 2.7a	32.2 ± 17.8b	20.6 ± 9.5c
EDTA (20 mM)	45.3 ± 22.02a	4.3 ± 3.03b	3.5 ± 3.2c
EGTA (20 mM)	42.5 ± 20.2a	2.9 ± 2.5b	3.9 ± 2.05c

The receptors of the vaginal epithelial cells for the three Lactobacillus strains appeared to be glycolipids, as deduced by the large decrease in the adherence capacity resulting from treatment of the vaginal cells with lipase and metaperiodate (Table 2).

TABLE 2

Nature of the receptors of the vaginal epithelial cells for the Lactobacillus strains

Vaginal cell treatment	No. of adherent cells (mean ± SD) of:
L. acidophilus	L. gasseri	L. jensenii
None (control)	46.1 ± 13.7	38.6 ± 15.4	24.3 ± 12.5
Proteinase K (1 mg/ml)	39.3 ± 15.05a	24.8 ± 13.6b	30.7 ± 9.4c
Lipase (1 mg/ml)	1.6 ± 1.4a	5.9 ± 5.5b	5 ± 1.7c
Sodium metaperiodate (10 mg/ml)	1.1 ± 0.9a	10.7 ± 6.7b	2.9 ± 2.5c

Adhesion interference of urogenital pathogens.

Strains of four potential genitourinary pathogens were obtained from the same vaginal exudates that rendered the lactobacilli used in this work. In this way, we attempted to compare the behavior of strains that presumptively were competing for the same biotope. No adhesion to epithelial vaginal cells was observed for E. coli and S. agalactiae. However, C. albicans and G. vaginalis were adherent. The adhesion interference experiments were then restricted to strains of these two species, with the competing strain being L. acidophilus. A large reduction in adherence was observed when C. albicans cells were added together with L. acidophilus cells to the vaginal cells. The same was found for G. vaginalis which, in addition, was displaced by the lactobacilli when attached to the vaginal cells (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Effect of L. acidophilus on the attachment of C. albicans and G. vaginalis to vaginal epithelial cells under conditions of exclusion, competition, and displacement

Strain	No. of adherent cells (mean ± SD) under the following conditions:
Control	Competition	Exclusion	Displacement
C. albicans	22.5 ± 5	5.5 ± 2.8a	23 ± 10.6a	18.2 ± 7.4a
G. vaginalis	34.5 ± 9.8	8 ± 3.1b	37.5 ± 6.5b	5.3 ± 2.8b

Coaggregation experiments.

Mixed cultures of all three Lactobacillus strains with any of the four potential pathogens showed coaggregation with E. coli, C. albicans, and G. vaginalis but not with S. agalactiae (Table 4). As an example, Fig. 4A shows the microscopic appearance of the aggregates formed between C. albicans and L. acidophilus, which contrasts with the presence of isolated S. agalactiae cells surrounding aggregates of the same lactobacilli (Fig. 4B).

TABLE 4

Coaggregation between L. acidophilus and some genitourinary tract pathogens

Strain	Coaggregation score for:
C. albicans	E. coli	S. agalactiae	G. vaginalis
L. acidophilus	3	3	0	3
L. gasseri	4	4	0	4
L. jensenii	2	2	0	2

Microscopic observations of coaggregation between L. acidophilus and C. albicans (A) and the lack of coaggregation between L. acidophilus and S. agalactiae (B).

DISCUSSION

In recent years, there has been an increasing recognition of the role of lactobacilli in the maintenance of the homeostasis within dynamic ecosystems such as the vagina and in the prevention of colonization and infection caused by pathogenic organisms (11).

Lactobacilli are important components of the normal vaginal microbiota. They help to repel invading pathogens and may also prevent urinary tract infections by interfering with the colonization of the periurethral epithelium by uropathogens such as E. coli. Thus, a loss of vaginal lactobacilli may predispose women to the acquisition of genitourinary infections.

For this reason, the prophylactic use of selected Lactobacillus strains may be an effective means of restoring the normal microbial flora in the vagina (9, 11), thus preventing infections. The characteristics needed for a Lactobacillus strain to serve effectively as a prophylactic agent include avid adherence to vaginal epithelial cells, interference with the adherence of other pathogens, and the production of H2O2 and/or other molecules capable of inhibiting the growth of pathogens (1).

At present, the molecular mechanisms by which lactobacilli adhere to epithelial cells remain unknown. Several studies have suggested that Lactobacillus adherence is mediated by proteins (6, 8, 22), while others have suggested a role for lipoteichoic acid (5) and carbohydrate (4, 7).

The three vaginal isolates selected in this work were able to self-aggregate in a process mediated by surface proteins or lipoproteins. In addition, the three strains strongly adhered to vaginal epithelial cells, whereas lactobacilli recovered from other sources, such as dairy products, adhered in significantly lower numbers, indicating that adherence is an idiosyncratic property of vaginal lactobacilli.

Both self-aggregation and adhesion may favor the colonization of the vaginal epithelium through the formation of a bacterial film that may contribute to the exclusion of pathogens from the vaginal mucosa.

Multiple components of the bacterial cell surface seem to participate in the adherence of the strains to vaginal epithelial cells. In L. acidophilus and L. gasseri, adherence involved proteins and carbohydrate (possibly a glycoprotein), while L. jensenii adherence seemed to depend exclusively on carbohydrates. In L. gasseri and L. jensenii, divalent cations, probably Ca2+, were also involved in adherence, as judged by sensitivity to EDTA and EGTA. This diversity of adherence requirements was reported before, although for digestive epithelium. Thus, L. fermentum adherence to mouse squamous epithelium was sensitive to chelating agents (6), while colonization of chicken tissue by L. acidophilus was not (7). However, the adherence factors seem to be different from those that mediate the self-aggregation of the strains; for example, L. jensenii self-aggregation depends on lipoproteins, while adherence to vaginal cells relies on carbohydrates.

The vaginal lactobacilli interfered with the adherence of genitourinary pathogens. In this respect, it is interesting to note first that C. albicans and G. vaginalis adhered to vaginal epithelial cells, while E. coli and S. agalactiae did not. Since the first two organisms produce pathology primarily at the vaginal level, while the others are just opportunistic pathogens, it may be deduced that adherence is an important virulence factor.

It is possible that L. acidophilus and G. vaginalis bind to the same receptors on the surfaces of vaginal epithelial cells. It appears that the affinity of L. acidophilus for those receptors is higher than that of G. vaginalis, as deduced by the displacement by L. acidophilus of adherent cells of G. vaginalis.

Finally, the vaginal lactobacilli coaggregated with all of the pathogens, with the exception of S. agalactiae, suggesting that this process is somewhat specific. The coaggregation may well impede the access of pathogens to tissue receptors and in fact may be an alternative explanation for the lack of adherence of C. albicans and G. vaginalis to vaginal epithelial cells in the presence of lactobacilli.

In conclusion, the lactobacilli used in this study may protect the vaginal epithelium through a series of barrier (self-aggregation, adherence) and interference (receptor binding interference, coaggregation with potential pathogens) mechanisms. Consequently, they may be excellent candidates for eventual use as prophylactic agents. Studies to further evaluate their feasibility as such are under way.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by grants ALI93-873-C02 and ALI97-0658-C03 from DGICYT of the Spanish Ministry of Education. S. Boris was the recipient of a predoctoral fellowship from Fundación para el Fomento en Asturias de la Investigación Científica Aplicada y la Tecnología Spain.

We thank Rosa González (Hospital Monte Naranco, Oviedo, Spain) for the kind gift of vaginal epithelial cells.

REFERENCES

1. Andreu A, Stapleton A E, Fennell C L, Hillier S L, Stamm W E. Hemagglutination, adherence and surface properties of vaginal Lactobacillus species. J Infect Dis. 1995;171:1237–1243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Barrow P A, Brooker P E, Fuller R, Newport M J. The attachment of bacteria to the gastric epithelium of the pig and its importance in the microecology of the intestine. J Appl Bacteriol. 1980;48:147–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Boris S, Suárez J E, Barbés C. Characterization of the aggregation promoting factor from Lactobacillus gasseri, a vaginal isolate. J Appl Microbiol. 1997;83:413–420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Brooker B E, Fuller R. Adhesion of lactobacilli to the chicken crop epithelium. J Ultrastruct Res. 1975;52:21–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Chan R C Y, Reid G, Irvin R T, Bruce A W, Costerton J W. Competitive exclusion of uropathogens from human uroepithelial cells by Lactobacillus whole cells and cell wall fragments. Infect Immun. 1985;47:84–89. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Conway P L, Kjelleberg S. Protein-mediated adhesion of Lactobacillus fermentum strain 737 to mouse stomach squamous epithelium. J Gen Microbiol. 1989;135:1175–1186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Fuller R. Nature of the determinant responsible for the adhesion of lactobacilli to chicken crop epithelial cells. J Gen Microbiol. 1975;87:245–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Henriksson A, Szewzyk R, Conway P L. Characteristics of the adhesive determinants of Lactobacillus fermentum 104. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57:499–502. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Hilton E, Isenberg H D, Alperstein P, France K, Borenstein M T. Ingested yogurt as prophylaxis for chronic candidal vaginitis. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:353–357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Mayo B, Hardisson C, Braña A F. Selected characteristics of several strains of Lactobacillus plantarum. Microbiología SEM. 1989;5:105–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. McGroarty J A. Probiotic use of lactobacilli in the human female urogenital tract. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1993;6:251–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. McGroarty J A, Reid G. Detection of a Lactobacillus substance that inhibits Escherichia coli. Can J Microbiol. 1988;34:974–978. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Raibaud P, Caulet M, Galpin J V, Mocquot G. Studies on the bacterial flora of the alimentary tract of pigs. II. Streptococci: selective enumeration and differentiation of the dominant group. J Appl Bacteriol. 1961;24:285–306. [Google Scholar]

14. Redondo-López V, Cook R L, Sobel J D. Emerging role of lactobacilli in the control and maintenance of the vaginal bacterial microflora. Rev Infect Dis. 1990;12:856–872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Reid G, McGroarty J A, Angotti R, Cook R L. Lactobacillus inhibitor production against Escherichia coli and coaggregation ability with uropathogens. Can J Microbiol. 1988;34:344–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Reid G, McGroarty J A, Gil Domingue P A, Chow A W, Bruce A W, Eisen A, Costerton J W. Coaggregation of urogenital bacteria in vitro and in vivo. Curr Microbiol. 1990;20:47–52. [Google Scholar]

17. Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E. Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: a simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1980;9:29–33. [Google Scholar]

18. Sobel J D. Vaginitis and vaginal flora: controversies abound. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 1996;9:42–47. [Google Scholar]

19. Spencer R J, Chesson A. The effect of Lactobacillus spp. on the attachment of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli to isolated porcine enterocytes. J Appl Bacteriol. 1994;77:215–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Vandevoorde L, Christiaens N, Verstraete W. Prevalence of coaggregation reactions among chicken lactobacilli. J Appl Bacteriol. 1992;72:214–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Velraeds M C M, van der Mei H C, Reid G, Busscher H J. Inhibition of initial adhesion of uropathogenic Enterococcus faecalis by biosurfactants from Lactobacillus isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:1958–1963. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Wadström T, Andersson K, Sydow M, Axelsson L, Lindgren S, Gullmar B. Surface properties of lactobacilli isolated from the small intestine of pigs. J Appl Microbiol. 1987;62:513–520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Wood J R, Sweet R L, Catena A, Hadley W K, Robbie M. In vitro adherence of Lactobacillus species to vaginal epithelial cells. J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;153:740–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)