The Selection-Mutation-Drift Theory of Synonymous Codon Usage (original) (raw)

Abstract

It is argued that the bias in synonymous codon usage observed in unicellular organisms is due to a balance between the forces of selection and mutation in a finite population, with greater bias in highly expressed genes reflecting stronger selection for efficiency of translation. A population genetic model is developed taking into account population size and selective differences between synonymous codons. A biochemical model is then developed to predict the magnitude of selective differences between synonymous codons in unicellular organisms in which growth rate (or possibly growth yield) can be equated with fitness. Selection can arise from differences in either the speed or the accuracy of translation. A model for the effect of speed of translation on fitness is considered in detail, a similar model for accuracy more briefly. The model is successful in predicting a difference in the degree of bias at the beginning than in the rest of the gene under some circumstances, as observed in Escherichia coli, but grossly overestimates the amount of bias expected. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen K. B., von Meyenburg K. Are growth rates of Escherichia coli in batch cultures limited by respiration? J Bacteriol. 1980 Oct;144(1):114–123. doi: 10.1128/jb.144.1.114-123.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson D. I., van Verseveld H. W., Stouthamer A. H., Kurland C. G. Suboptimal growth with hyper-accurate ribosomes. Arch Microbiol. 1986 Feb;144(1):96–101. doi: 10.1007/BF00454963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bilgin N., Ehrenberg M., Kurland C. Is translation inhibited by noncognate ternary complexes? FEBS Lett. 1988 Jun 6;233(1):95–99. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)81362-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bulmer M. Codon usage and intragenic position. J Theor Biol. 1988 Jul 8;133(1):67–71. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(88)80024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bulmer M. Codon usage and secondary structure of MS2 phage RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Mar 11;17(5):1839–1843. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.5.1839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bulmer M. Coevolution of codon usage and transfer RNA abundance. Nature. 1987 Feb 19;325(6106):728–730. doi: 10.1038/325728a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Felsenstein J. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics. 1974 Oct;78(2):737–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.2.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gold L. Posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Biochem. 1988;57:199–233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.57.070188.001215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gouy M., Grantham R. Polypeptide elongation and tRNA cycling in Escherichia coli: a dynamic approach. FEBS Lett. 1980 Jun 30;115(2):151–155. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)81155-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grantham R., Gautier C., Gouy M., Jacobzone M., Mercier R. Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jan 10;9(1):r43–r74. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.1.213-b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grantham R., Gautier C., Gouy M., Mercier R., Pavé A. Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Jan 11;8(1):r49–r62. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.1.197-c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harley C. B., Pollard J. W., Stanners C. P., Goldstein S. Model for messenger RNA translation during amino acid starvation applied to the calculation of protein synthetic error rates. J Biol Chem. 1981 Nov 10;256(21):10786–10794. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Harms E., Umbarger H. E. Role of codon choice in the leader region of the ilvGMEDA operon of Serratia marcescens. J Bacteriol. 1987 Dec;169(12):5668–5677. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.12.5668-5677.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hasegawa M., Yasunaga T., Miyata T. Secondary structure of MS2 phage RNA and bias in code word usage. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Dec 11;7(7):2073–2079. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.7.2073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hill W. G., Robertson A. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res. 1966 Dec;8(3):269–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hinds P. W., Blake R. D. Delineation of coding areas in DNA sequences through assignment of codon probabilities. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1985 Dec;3(3):543–549. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1985.10508442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ikemura T. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Jan;2(1):13–34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kacser H., Burns J. A. The control of flux. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1973;27:65–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kato M. Codon discrimination due to presence of abundant non-cognate competitive tRNA. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jan 9;142(1):35–39. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kimura M. Possibility of extensive neutral evolution under stabilizing selection with special reference to nonrandom usage of synonymous codons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Sep;78(9):5773–5777. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.9.5773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Konigsberg W., Godson G. N. Evidence for use of rare codons in the dnaG gene and other regulatory genes of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Feb;80(3):687–691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.3.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kozak M. Comparison of initiation of protein synthesis in procaryotes, eucaryotes, and organelles. Microbiol Rev. 1983 Mar;47(1):1–45. doi: 10.1128/mr.47.1.1-45.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liljenström H., von Heijne G. Translation rate modification by preferential codon usage: intragenic position effects. J Theor Biol. 1987 Jan 7;124(1):43–55. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80251-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pedersen S., Bloch P. L., Reeh S., Neidhardt F. C. Patterns of protein synthesis in E. coli: a catalog of the amount of 140 individual proteins at different growth rates. Cell. 1978 May;14(1):179–190. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90312-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Petersen G. B., Stockwell P. A., Hill D. F. Messenger RNA recognition in Escherichia coli: a possible second site of interaction with 16S ribosomal RNA. EMBO J. 1988 Dec 1;7(12):3957–3962. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03282.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Robinson M., Lilley R., Little S., Emtage J. S., Yarranton G., Stephens P., Millican A., Eaton M., Humphreys G. Codon usage can affect efficiency of translation of genes in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Sep 11;12(17):6663–6671. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.17.6663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ruusala T., Ehrenberg M., Kurland C. G. Is there proofreading during polypeptide synthesis? EMBO J. 1982;1(6):741–745. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01240.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sawyer S. A., Dykhuizen D. E., Hartl D. L. Confidence interval for the number of selectively neutral amino acid polymorphisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6225–6228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 May;4(3):222–230. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shields D. C., Sharp P. M. Synonymous codon usage in Bacillus subtilis reflects both translational selection and mutational biases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Oct 12;15(19):8023–8040. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.19.8023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shields D. C. Switches in species-specific codon preferences: the influence of mutation biases. J Mol Evol. 1990 Aug;31(2):71–80. doi: 10.1007/BF02109476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shpaer E. G. Constraints on codon context in Escherichia coli genes. Their possible role in modulating the efficiency of translation. J Mol Biol. 1986 Apr 20;188(4):555–564. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(86)80005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sprengart M. L., Fatscher H. P., Fuchs E. The initiation of translation in E. coli: apparent base pairing between the 16srRNA and downstream sequences of the mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Apr 11;18(7):1719–1723. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.7.1719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sørensen M. A., Kurland C. G., Pedersen S. Codon usage determines translation rate in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1989 May 20;207(2):365–377. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90260-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tomich C. S., Olson E. R., Olsen M. K., Kaytes P. S., Rockenbach S. K., Hatzenbuhler N. T. Effect of nucleotide sequences directly downstream from the AUG on the expression of bovine somatotropin in E. coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Apr 25;17(8):3179–3197. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.8.3179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Varenne S., Baty D., Verheij H., Shire D., Lazdunski C. The maximum rate of gene expression is dependent on the downstream context of unfavourable codons. Biochimie. 1989 Nov-Dec;71(11-12):1221–1229. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(89)90027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Varenne S., Buc J., Lloubes R., Lazdunski C. Translation is a non-uniform process. Effect of tRNA availability on the rate of elongation of nascent polypeptide chains. J Mol Biol. 1984 Dec 15;180(3):549–576. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90027-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Walker J. E., Saraste M., Gay N. J. The unc operon. Nucleotide sequence, regulation and structure of ATP-synthase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Sep 6;768(2):164–200. doi: 10.1016/0304-4173(84)90003-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. von Heijne G., Blomberg C., Liljenström H. Theoretical modelling of protein synthesis. J Theor Biol. 1987 Mar 7;125(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80175-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]