The Heterochronic Teopod1 and Teopod2 Mutations of Maize Are Expressed Non-Cell-Autonomously (original) (raw)

Abstract

Teopod1 and Teopod2 are dominant, unlinked mutations in maize that cause dramatic morphological abnormalities, including inappropriate expression of juvenile traits in adult vegetative phytomers and the transformation of reproductive structures into vegetative ones. These phenotypes are consistent with the constitutive expression of a juvenile phase of development throughout shoot growth. To investigate the basis of the Tp1 and Tp2 phenotypes we have analyzed their cell-autonomy in mosaic Teopod:wild-type plants. Mosaic plants were generated by three different mechanisms. Tp1 has previously been shown to be non-cell-autonomous; to verify and extend these results, large wild-type sectors were generated on Tp1 plants by the spontaneous loss of a B-A translocation chromosome containing the Tp1 gene. Analysis of Tp2 cell-autonomy was complicated by a lack of useful markers on chromosome 10L proximal to Tp2. To circumvent this problem two strategies were used. A reciprocal translocation was used to link Tp2 the the wild-type allele of lw2. Sectors were induced in plants of this type by irradiation of imbibed seeds. Also, a chromosome-breaking Ds element located proximal to Tp2 was used to generate somatic sectors that uncovered w2, an albino mutation distal to Tp2. Our results demonstrate conclusively that both Tp1 and Tp2 are non-cell-autonomous. The general use of these techniques for clonal analysis in plants and the potential role of a diffusible factor in regulating the juvenile phase of development in maize are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bassiri A., Irish E. E., Poethig R. S. Heterochronic Effects of Teopod 2 on the Growth and Photosensitivity of the Maize Shoot. Plant Cell. 1992 Apr;4(4):497–504. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.4.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dawe R. K., Freeling M. Clonal analysis of the cell lineages in the male flower of maize. Dev Biol. 1990 Nov;142(1):233–245. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(90)90167-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dudley M., Poethig R. S. The effect of a heterochronic mutation, Teopod2, on the cell lineage of the maize shoot. Development. 1991 Mar;111(3):733–739. doi: 10.1242/dev.111.3.733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Poethig R. S. Heterochronic mutations affecting shoot development in maize. Genetics. 1988 Aug;119(4):959–973. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.4.959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Poethig R. S. Phase change and the regulation of shoot morphogenesis in plants. Science. 1990 Nov 16;250(4983):923–930. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4983.923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vollbrecht E., Veit B., Sinha N., Hake S. The developmental gene Knotted-1 is a member of a maize homeobox gene family. Nature. 1991 Mar 21;350(6315):241–243. doi: 10.1038/350241a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]