Blood glucose self-monitoring in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study of patients' perspectives (original) (raw)

. 2004 Mar;54(500):183–188.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring of blood glucose is controversial in the management of type 2 diabetes. Some research suggests that self-monitoring improves glycaemic control, whereas other research is sceptical about its value for people with type 2 diabetes who are not on insulin. Although blood glucose meters are widely available and used by this group, patients' own views are absent from the debate. AIM: To explore the pros and cons of glucose monitoring from the patients' perspectives. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative repeat-interview study. SETTING: Patients were recruited from 16 general practices and three hospital clinics within four local healthcare cooperatives in Lothian, Scotland. METHOD: Interview data from 40 patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes within the previous 6 months were analysed using thematic analysis informed by grounded theory. We report findings from round 1 and round 2 interviews. RESULTS: Glucose monitoring can heighten patients' awareness of the impact of lifestyle; for example, dietary choices, on blood glucose levels. Glucose monitoring amplifies a sense of 'success' or 'failure' about self-management, often resulting in anxiety and self-blame if glucose readings remain consistently high. Moreover, monitoring can negatively effect patients' self-management when readings are counter-intuitive. CONCLUSION: Our analysis highlights the importance of understanding the meanings that newly diagnosed patients attach to glucose self-monitoring. To maximise the positive effects of self-monitoring, health professionals should ensure that patients understand the purpose of monitoring and should clarify with patients how readings should be interpreted.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (39.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson R. M., Robins L. S. How do we know? Reflections on qualitative research in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998 Sep;21(9):1387–1388. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.9.1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Britten N., Jones R., Murphy E., Stacy R. Qualitative research methods in general practice and primary care. Fam Pract. 1995 Mar;12(1):104–114. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.1.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Callaghan D., Williams A. Living with diabetes: issues for nursing practice. J Adv Nurs. 1994 Jul;20(1):132–139. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20010132.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coster S., Gulliford M. C., Seed P. T., Powrie J. K., Swaminathan R. Self-monitoring in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2000 Nov;17(11):755–761. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00390.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cunningham M. A. Glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes. Nurs Clin North Am. 2001 Jun;36(2):361-74, viii. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans J. M., Newton R. W., Ruta D. A., MacDonald T. M., Stevenson R. J., Morris A. D. Frequency of blood glucose monitoring in relation to glycaemic control: observational study with diabetes database. BMJ. 1999 Jul 10;319(7202):83–86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7202.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Faas A., Schellevis F. G., Van Eijk J. T. The efficacy of self-monitoring of blood glucose in NIDDM subjects. A criteria-based literature review. Diabetes Care. 1997 Sep;20(9):1482–1486. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.9.1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fontbonne A., Billault B., Acosta M., Percheron C., Varenne P., Besse A., Eschwege E., Monnier L., Slama G., Passa P. Is glucose self-monitoring beneficial in non-insulin-treated diabetic patients? Results of a randomized comparative trial. Diabete Metab. 1989 Sep-Oct;15(5):255–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Franciosi M., Pellegrini F., De Berardis G., Belfiglio M., Cavaliere D., Di Nardo B., Greenfield S., Kaplan S. H., Sacco M., Tognoni G. The impact of blood glucose self-monitoring on metabolic control and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients: an urgent need for better educational strategies. Diabetes Care. 2001 Nov;24(11):1870–1877. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.11.1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gallichan M. Self monitoring of glucose by people with diabetes: evidence based practice. BMJ. 1997 Mar 29;314(7085):964–967. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7085.964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harris M. I., National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) Frequency of blood glucose monitoring in relation to glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001 Jun;24(6):979–982. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.6.979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hunt K., Emslie C., Watt G. Lay constructions of a family history of heart disease: potential for misunderstandings in the clinical encounter? Lancet. 2001 Apr 14;357(9263):1168–1171. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04334-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Med M. Prenatal development of lumbar intervertebral articulation. Folia Morphol (Praha) 1982;30(3):285–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meier Joy L., Swislocki Arthur L. M., Lopez Julio R., Noth Robert H., Bartlebaugh Patricia, Siegel David. Reduction in self-monitoring of blood glucose in persons with type 2 diabetes results in cost savings and no change in glycemic control. Am J Manag Care. 2002 Jun;8(6):557–565. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Morris A. D., Boyle D. I., MacAlpine R., Emslie-Smith A., Jung R. T., Newton R. W., MacDonald T. M. The diabetes audit and research in Tayside Scotland (DARTS) study: electronic record linkage to create a diabetes register. DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. BMJ. 1997 Aug 30;315(7107):524–528. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7107.524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Patrick A. W., Gill G. V., MacFarlane I. A., Cullen A., Power E., Wallymahmed M. Home glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes: is it a waste of time? Diabet Med. 1994 Jan-Feb;11(1):62–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00231.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pope C., Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):42–45. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rindone J. P., Austin M., Luchesi J. Effect of home blood glucose monitoring on the management of patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in the primary care setting. Am J Manag Care. 1997 Sep;3(9):1335–1338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Worth R., Home P. D., Johnston D. G., Anderson J., Ashworth L., Burrin J. M., Appleton D., Binder C., Alberti K. G. Intensive attention improves glycaemic control in insulin-dependent diabetes without further advantage from home blood glucose monitoring: results of a controlled trial. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Oct 30;285(6350):1233–1240. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6350.1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]